I've been really proud of myself as this new semester begins as I've been focused and getting a bunch of work during the day and then still being able to catch the late movie at the budget theater in order to catch up on all the movies I want to see. But you don't want to hear about that, you'd rather just read my review (if you even want to do that), so let's get to it.
Next up here is Body of Lies, a political thriller that came out last October. Starring Russell Crowe and Leonardo DiCaprio and directed by Ridley Scott, this seemed like a sure-fire hit. But what it was, was a complete miss. The movie just rolls on looking for a voice and never finds it. They basically just cobbled together a bunch of random concepts related to the war on terror and hoped their collective effort would create some sort of message.
DiCaprio plays Roger Farris, a CIA operative on the hunt for a terrorist who has been behind a series of recent bombings. Crowe plays his boss, who doesn't share his same philosophical viewpoints on how to handle these situations. If the film would have been that straight-forward, it might have been decent. But there is so much excess baggage attached to this plot that you can't keep straight what is important and what is mere filler.
The big selling point for a lot of people I think was getting to see the showdown between Crowe and DiCaprio. Seeing them verbally spar over morality and secrecy in the war on terror could have been really perplexing, but it never reaches that status. Crowe, who's usually so good in these roles seems like he's phoning it in here, no pun intended considering he spends the majority of the film on a phone. And as for DiCaprio, he seems to fade in and out of character during his speeches. You can tell what is Roger Farris and what is DiCaprio simply spouting off his own liberal agenda. The debates between these two come off more juvenille and frivolous rather than engaging or thought-provoking.
With the dialogue here completely neutered, one would hope you could fall back on the action to get you through the movie, but that too is a failure. The whole plot about trying to capture this terrorist doesn't work because the audience is never given sufficient justification to want to see him taken down. The bombings he orchestrates have no direct impact on the main characters, nor do they take place on American soil. Now I don't mean to underscore the action, but if you're going to center a film around a villain, more needs to be done to make us want to see his comeuppance.
Perhaps one of the most nauseating things about this film is how they shoehorned a romance subplot between DiCaprio's character and a Palestinian nurse. As soon as I saw DiCaprio being treated by her, I knew they would have him fall for her. And it seemed the only reason this was included was to make the statement that people from the Middle East are human beings too and we shouldn't discriminate. And that is a fine statement to make, but it has become a complete cliche in film now. It added nothing to the film and was used merely for plot device.
Now Body of Lies was based of a novel by David Ignatius. You probably would have guessed it even if I hadn't told you it. The events in the film are very segmented to the degree that you could probably tell where each chapter begun and ended in the book. Like so many film adaptations before this, I believe this was a case where the written word simply did not translate well to the big screen. I'm sure the conversations between the characters in the book were a lot more meaningful and impassioned, whereas here they were stilted.
Maybe I'm sure a bit fatigued, like so many Americans, with the war on terrors and films about it. With so many of them out there, you really need something special and unique in your film, otherwise it's just a grim reminder of what's going on in the real world. This did not possess that special trait and as a result I was bored to tears watching this.
I'm having difficulty finding a justification to give someone to watch this. I guess if you're a hardcore Crowe or DiCaprio fan or if for some reason you really love this subject matter, then you may want to see it, but I think even those people will be strongly disappointed with this film. If I were to say something positive, it would be that the film is an accurate metaphor for the war on terror. While our soldiers are fighting an ambiguous enemy, viewers of this film are watching a movie with an ambiguous plot. This movie just doesn't work and that aint no Lie. Grade: C-
Friday, January 9, 2009
Thursday, January 8, 2009
30 Must See Movies for '09 (5-1)
Sorry for the extra day wait, but I had so much good stuff to post yesterday I didn't want another post to cause everything to get lost in the shuffle.
5. The Informant (Sept. 19)
Plot: What was Mark Whitacre thinking? A rising star at agri-industry giant Archer Daniels Midland (ADM), Whitacre suddenly turns whistleblower. Even as he exposes his company's multi-national price-fixing conspiracy to the FBI, Whitacre envisions himself being hailed as a hero of the common man and handed a promotion. But before all that can happen, the FBI needs evidence, so Whitacre eagerly agrees to wear a wire and carry a hidden tape recorder in his briefcase, imagining himself as a kind of de facto secret agent. Unfortunately for the FBI, their lead witness hasn't been quite so forthcoming about helping himself to the corporate coffers. Whitacre's ever-changing account frustrates the agents and threatens the case against ADM as it becomes almost impossible to decipher what is real and what is the product of Whitacre's rambling imagination. Based on the true story of the highest-ranking corporate whistleblower in U.S. history.
Personal opinion: With Matt Damon and The Soup's Joel McHale in the cast, I was already sold. This is being directed by Steven Soderbergh, who hasn't done anything great lately, so he's due. You may not be able to tell from the plot description, but this is supposed to be a comedy thriller. This sounds like it's either going to be brilliant or terrible. Of course, by me putting it this high, I'm banking on it to be the former. By the way, Matt Damon put on 30 pounds for this role and you can barely recognize him. Take a look:
4. Public Enemies (July 1)
Plot: In the action-thriller "Public Enemies," acclaimed filmmaker Michael Mann directs Johnny Depp, Christian Bale and Academy Award® winner Marion Cotillard in the story of legendary Depression-era outlaw John Dillinger (Depp)—the charismatic bank robber whose lightning raids made him the number one target of J. Edgar Hoover's fledgling FBI and its top agent, Melvin Purvis (Bale), and a folk hero to much of the downtrodden public.
Personal opinion: Having Bale and Depp in the same film is a dream team. Having Michael Mann (Collateral) direct it is just the cherry on top. Let's just hope though that unlike in American Gangster these two acclaimed actors actually share the screen for more than five minutes. This doesn't seem like your typical 4th of July release, but I can't wait for it nonetheless.
3. Funny People (July 31)
Plot: Over the past few years, writer/director Judd Apatow ("The 40-Year-Old Virgin," "Knocked Up") has shown that nothing—not even losing your virginity or the miracle of childbirth—is sacred. About his third film behind the camera, he says, "I'm trying to make a very serious movie that is twice as funny as my other movies. Wish me luck!" Apatow directs Adam Sandler, Seth Rogen and Leslie Mann in "Funny People," the story of a famous comedian who has a near-death experience.
Personal opinion: After a string of varying in quality films produced by Judd Apatow, the comedy king is finally back directing again. The 40 Year Old Virgin is just an amazing film and Knocked Up was pretty good too, so I'm very excited to see what he has in store for us now. This one seems to have a more serious tone, but I don't know for sure yet. And casting Sandler seems odd since he's not considered part of the Apatow mafia, but I trust Judd and know that he'll get the best out of him. This right now is the can't miss comedy of the year.
2. Sherlock Holmes (November 20)
Plot: In a dynamic new portrayal of Arthur Conan Doyle's most famous characters, "Sherlock Holmes" sends Holmes and his stalwart partner Watson on their latest challenge. Revealing fighting skills as lethal as his legendary intellect, Holmes will battle as never before to bring down a new nemesis and unravel a deadly plot that could destroy the country.
Personal opinion: Robert Downey Jr. could not be hotter right now and I'm eager to see what he has in store for his interpretation of the famed detective. I'm a bit worried by the fact that Guy Ritchie is directing it because I've never seen any of his films and really don't know his style. However, I can't deny that I love a good mystery and this should do nicely. It's helps having a good supporting cast with Jude Law and Rachel McAdams included. In case you weren't aware, this will be the first of two different movies about Holmes coming out. The other starring Will Ferrel and Sasha Baron Cohen does not yet have a release date.
1. Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince (July 17)
Plot: Voldemort is tightening his grip on both the Muggle and wizarding worlds and Hogwarts is no longer the safe haven it once was. Harry suspects that dangers may even lie within the castle, but Dumbledore is more intent upon preparing him for the final battle that he knows is fast approaching. Together they work to find the key to unlock Voldemort's defenses and, to this end, Dumbledore recruits his old friend and colleague, the well-connected and unsuspecting bon vivant Professor Horace Slughorn, whom he believes holds crucial information. Meanwhile, the students are under attack from a very different adversary as teenage hormones rage across the ramparts. Harry finds himself more and more drawn to Ginny, but so is Dean Thomas. And Lavender Brown has decided that Ron is the one for her, only she hadn’t counted on Romilda Vane's chocolates! And then there's Hermione, simpering with jealously but determined not to show her feelings. As romance blossoms, one student remains aloof. He is determined to make his mark, albeit a dark one. Love is in the air, but tragedy lies ahead and Hogwarts may never be the same again.
Personal opinion: Was there any doubt that this would be #1? It is kind of sad though that my top film for '09 was actually supposed to be released last year. Still, it's obvious I and many others love this franchise and are excited about this film, particularly because it's based on one of the best books in the series. It's a shame the director from Order of the Phoenix is doing this one as well, but let's hope he learned from his mistakes and won't cut out so much material in this one. Even if you aren't a Potter fan, you can't deny that this will be one of summer's biggest movies.
So there you have it, all 30 have been revealed. Now let's just quickly get through the dregs of January so that we can start watching some of these!
5. The Informant (Sept. 19)
Plot: What was Mark Whitacre thinking? A rising star at agri-industry giant Archer Daniels Midland (ADM), Whitacre suddenly turns whistleblower. Even as he exposes his company's multi-national price-fixing conspiracy to the FBI, Whitacre envisions himself being hailed as a hero of the common man and handed a promotion. But before all that can happen, the FBI needs evidence, so Whitacre eagerly agrees to wear a wire and carry a hidden tape recorder in his briefcase, imagining himself as a kind of de facto secret agent. Unfortunately for the FBI, their lead witness hasn't been quite so forthcoming about helping himself to the corporate coffers. Whitacre's ever-changing account frustrates the agents and threatens the case against ADM as it becomes almost impossible to decipher what is real and what is the product of Whitacre's rambling imagination. Based on the true story of the highest-ranking corporate whistleblower in U.S. history.
Personal opinion: With Matt Damon and The Soup's Joel McHale in the cast, I was already sold. This is being directed by Steven Soderbergh, who hasn't done anything great lately, so he's due. You may not be able to tell from the plot description, but this is supposed to be a comedy thriller. This sounds like it's either going to be brilliant or terrible. Of course, by me putting it this high, I'm banking on it to be the former. By the way, Matt Damon put on 30 pounds for this role and you can barely recognize him. Take a look:
4. Public Enemies (July 1)
Plot: In the action-thriller "Public Enemies," acclaimed filmmaker Michael Mann directs Johnny Depp, Christian Bale and Academy Award® winner Marion Cotillard in the story of legendary Depression-era outlaw John Dillinger (Depp)—the charismatic bank robber whose lightning raids made him the number one target of J. Edgar Hoover's fledgling FBI and its top agent, Melvin Purvis (Bale), and a folk hero to much of the downtrodden public.
Personal opinion: Having Bale and Depp in the same film is a dream team. Having Michael Mann (Collateral) direct it is just the cherry on top. Let's just hope though that unlike in American Gangster these two acclaimed actors actually share the screen for more than five minutes. This doesn't seem like your typical 4th of July release, but I can't wait for it nonetheless.
3. Funny People (July 31)
Plot: Over the past few years, writer/director Judd Apatow ("The 40-Year-Old Virgin," "Knocked Up") has shown that nothing—not even losing your virginity or the miracle of childbirth—is sacred. About his third film behind the camera, he says, "I'm trying to make a very serious movie that is twice as funny as my other movies. Wish me luck!" Apatow directs Adam Sandler, Seth Rogen and Leslie Mann in "Funny People," the story of a famous comedian who has a near-death experience.
Personal opinion: After a string of varying in quality films produced by Judd Apatow, the comedy king is finally back directing again. The 40 Year Old Virgin is just an amazing film and Knocked Up was pretty good too, so I'm very excited to see what he has in store for us now. This one seems to have a more serious tone, but I don't know for sure yet. And casting Sandler seems odd since he's not considered part of the Apatow mafia, but I trust Judd and know that he'll get the best out of him. This right now is the can't miss comedy of the year.
2. Sherlock Holmes (November 20)
Plot: In a dynamic new portrayal of Arthur Conan Doyle's most famous characters, "Sherlock Holmes" sends Holmes and his stalwart partner Watson on their latest challenge. Revealing fighting skills as lethal as his legendary intellect, Holmes will battle as never before to bring down a new nemesis and unravel a deadly plot that could destroy the country.
Personal opinion: Robert Downey Jr. could not be hotter right now and I'm eager to see what he has in store for his interpretation of the famed detective. I'm a bit worried by the fact that Guy Ritchie is directing it because I've never seen any of his films and really don't know his style. However, I can't deny that I love a good mystery and this should do nicely. It's helps having a good supporting cast with Jude Law and Rachel McAdams included. In case you weren't aware, this will be the first of two different movies about Holmes coming out. The other starring Will Ferrel and Sasha Baron Cohen does not yet have a release date.
1. Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince (July 17)
Plot: Voldemort is tightening his grip on both the Muggle and wizarding worlds and Hogwarts is no longer the safe haven it once was. Harry suspects that dangers may even lie within the castle, but Dumbledore is more intent upon preparing him for the final battle that he knows is fast approaching. Together they work to find the key to unlock Voldemort's defenses and, to this end, Dumbledore recruits his old friend and colleague, the well-connected and unsuspecting bon vivant Professor Horace Slughorn, whom he believes holds crucial information. Meanwhile, the students are under attack from a very different adversary as teenage hormones rage across the ramparts. Harry finds himself more and more drawn to Ginny, but so is Dean Thomas. And Lavender Brown has decided that Ron is the one for her, only she hadn’t counted on Romilda Vane's chocolates! And then there's Hermione, simpering with jealously but determined not to show her feelings. As romance blossoms, one student remains aloof. He is determined to make his mark, albeit a dark one. Love is in the air, but tragedy lies ahead and Hogwarts may never be the same again.
Personal opinion: Was there any doubt that this would be #1? It is kind of sad though that my top film for '09 was actually supposed to be released last year. Still, it's obvious I and many others love this franchise and are excited about this film, particularly because it's based on one of the best books in the series. It's a shame the director from Order of the Phoenix is doing this one as well, but let's hope he learned from his mistakes and won't cut out so much material in this one. Even if you aren't a Potter fan, you can't deny that this will be one of summer's biggest movies.
So there you have it, all 30 have been revealed. Now let's just quickly get through the dregs of January so that we can start watching some of these!
Wednesday, January 7, 2009
Eye carumba
There's a handful of movies at the budget theater that I need to see, so I decided to catch one last night before the semester began, that being the latest Shia LaBeouf film, Eagle Eye.
Now anyone that knows me knows that I have never been fond of Shia since his rise to superstardom. The dislike for him began mostly out of spite, but as I continue to see more and more of his films, I feel that my criticisms are actually valid. Watching him here, I am beginning to see a pattern in his films where he is falling into what I call Tom Cruise syndrome. This is where the lead actor's character in a film acts like a complete douchebag the entire time, yet we as the audience are supposed to root for him because he's the protagonist. In this case, LaBeouf plays Jerry Shaw, who is an unmotivated, selfish jerk. I sat through the entire movie wondering why I should care whether he lives or dies. And of course, I don't think I'm giving much away by saying that of course he lives and also gets the girl; which was particularly frustrating because the female lead in this case (played by Michelle Monaghan) kept boasting how she had swore off men because her ex-husband was unmotivated and selfish, yet she falls for Jerry, who seemingly has the same qualities.
To be fair, most of these criticisms are about the character and not Shia himself. His acting isn't bad (it's not great either though), it's just that he never seems to play likeable characters. So really the fault lies with the writers for not making a more compelling character. Although, you could say that Shia is somewhat to blame for continuing to choose these characters.
OK enough ranting about Shia, let's get to the plot of the film, which is a doozy. If you saw the commercials, then you know that there is a mysterious person who is constantly calling Jerry and telling him what to do, all the while controlling all of the technology around him in order for him to complete the tasks set out for him. This is all about the concept of Big Brother and our love affair with all things technological. But don't be confused into thinking that this is some insightful commentary on Orwell's theories. This is a mindless action thriller that used the Big Brother idea as window dressing to string along a series of action sequences.
By the time it's revealed who (or what) is calling Jerry and controlling everything, you'll be too busy laughing to think of any deep philosophical implications about our reliance on technology. Sadly, things continue to become more elaborate and ludicrous from that point. What makes all of this even worse is the fact that it seemed like a lot of it could have been prevented a lot sooner than it was. The movie basically plays like an episode of Three's Company on steroids. Nobody actually communicates with each other or stops for a second to think rationally about what's going on and come up with an explanation for it in order to stop everything. The fact that Jerry continues to obey the phone caller and run from the government is mind-boggling.
For as dumb as the plot is, the action sequences that it does string together are pretty exciting. If your measure of a film is based solely on car chases and explosions, then chances are you'll probably really like this film. Even though this came out in September, the quality of the action here is equal to that of any summer blockbuster, which is probably why this did fairly well at the box office. As for me, while I do enjoy good action scenes, I need something a little bit more substanitive in my movies in order for me to recommend them.
If I were to point out one highlight in the film, it would have to be the performance by Billy Bob Thornton, who plays government agent Thomas Morgan. He's about the only one who shows any life in the film. He easily has the best lines in the film and seems to enjoy acting like a big shot, especially when he's interrogating Jerry. While his character was meant to be more antagonistic, I found myself rooting for him moreso than for anyone else. It's a shame he wasn't in the film more, because about the only time I really cared what was going on was during his scenes.
I feel sorry for those who paid top dollar to see this in the theaters, but as a rental it's probably not that bad of a choice. The action scenes will look and sound good in your home theater and you can just shut your mind off and enjoy some mindless entertainment for a couple of hours. Eagle Eye certainly isn't for the intellectual crowd, but it does serve a purpose. Now if only Shia could find a different purpose in life. I keed, I keed. Grade: C
Now anyone that knows me knows that I have never been fond of Shia since his rise to superstardom. The dislike for him began mostly out of spite, but as I continue to see more and more of his films, I feel that my criticisms are actually valid. Watching him here, I am beginning to see a pattern in his films where he is falling into what I call Tom Cruise syndrome. This is where the lead actor's character in a film acts like a complete douchebag the entire time, yet we as the audience are supposed to root for him because he's the protagonist. In this case, LaBeouf plays Jerry Shaw, who is an unmotivated, selfish jerk. I sat through the entire movie wondering why I should care whether he lives or dies. And of course, I don't think I'm giving much away by saying that of course he lives and also gets the girl; which was particularly frustrating because the female lead in this case (played by Michelle Monaghan) kept boasting how she had swore off men because her ex-husband was unmotivated and selfish, yet she falls for Jerry, who seemingly has the same qualities.
To be fair, most of these criticisms are about the character and not Shia himself. His acting isn't bad (it's not great either though), it's just that he never seems to play likeable characters. So really the fault lies with the writers for not making a more compelling character. Although, you could say that Shia is somewhat to blame for continuing to choose these characters.
OK enough ranting about Shia, let's get to the plot of the film, which is a doozy. If you saw the commercials, then you know that there is a mysterious person who is constantly calling Jerry and telling him what to do, all the while controlling all of the technology around him in order for him to complete the tasks set out for him. This is all about the concept of Big Brother and our love affair with all things technological. But don't be confused into thinking that this is some insightful commentary on Orwell's theories. This is a mindless action thriller that used the Big Brother idea as window dressing to string along a series of action sequences.
By the time it's revealed who (or what) is calling Jerry and controlling everything, you'll be too busy laughing to think of any deep philosophical implications about our reliance on technology. Sadly, things continue to become more elaborate and ludicrous from that point. What makes all of this even worse is the fact that it seemed like a lot of it could have been prevented a lot sooner than it was. The movie basically plays like an episode of Three's Company on steroids. Nobody actually communicates with each other or stops for a second to think rationally about what's going on and come up with an explanation for it in order to stop everything. The fact that Jerry continues to obey the phone caller and run from the government is mind-boggling.
For as dumb as the plot is, the action sequences that it does string together are pretty exciting. If your measure of a film is based solely on car chases and explosions, then chances are you'll probably really like this film. Even though this came out in September, the quality of the action here is equal to that of any summer blockbuster, which is probably why this did fairly well at the box office. As for me, while I do enjoy good action scenes, I need something a little bit more substanitive in my movies in order for me to recommend them.
If I were to point out one highlight in the film, it would have to be the performance by Billy Bob Thornton, who plays government agent Thomas Morgan. He's about the only one who shows any life in the film. He easily has the best lines in the film and seems to enjoy acting like a big shot, especially when he's interrogating Jerry. While his character was meant to be more antagonistic, I found myself rooting for him moreso than for anyone else. It's a shame he wasn't in the film more, because about the only time I really cared what was going on was during his scenes.
I feel sorry for those who paid top dollar to see this in the theaters, but as a rental it's probably not that bad of a choice. The action scenes will look and sound good in your home theater and you can just shut your mind off and enjoy some mindless entertainment for a couple of hours. Eagle Eye certainly isn't for the intellectual crowd, but it does serve a purpose. Now if only Shia could find a different purpose in life. I keed, I keed. Grade: C
Iron Man 2 villains announced
From ComingSoon.net:
I don't know enough about the Iron Man comics to know whether these villains are good choices. However, from an actor perspective, I've always thought Sam Rockwell was highly underrated, so it's nice to see him get a high profile gig. And as for Rourke, he's white hot right now with the praise he's getting for The Wrestler. It'll be cool to see this past year's two big comebacks (Rourke and Downey) share the screen together.
Mickey Rourke (The Wrestler) and Sam Rockwell (Frost/Nixon) are in talks to star as the villains in Marvel Studios' Iron Man 2, being directed by Jon Favreau from a script by Justin Theroux, according to Variety and The Hollywood Reporter.
THR says that Rourke would play a tattooed Russian heavy named Ivan who becomes a man with deadly, technologically enhanced coils. Variety adds that Rourke would play the Crimson Dynamo. "He's considered to be an evil version of Iron Man because he battles the superhero in a nuclear-powered suit of armor," says the trade.
Rockwell would play Justin Hammer, a multibillionaire businessman and a rival of industrialist Tony Stark, AKA Iron Man, being played by a returning Robert Downey Jr.
Rourke and Rockwell would be joining a cast that also includes the returning Gwyneth Paltrow and Don Cheadle, who is replacing Terrence Howard.
Another part -- one for Stark's assistant Natasha -- is still open.
The project is eyeing a spring start in Manhattan Beach. Paramount will release the movie May 7, 2010.
I don't know enough about the Iron Man comics to know whether these villains are good choices. However, from an actor perspective, I've always thought Sam Rockwell was highly underrated, so it's nice to see him get a high profile gig. And as for Rourke, he's white hot right now with the praise he's getting for The Wrestler. It'll be cool to see this past year's two big comebacks (Rourke and Downey) share the screen together.
Tuesday, January 6, 2009
30 Must See Movies for '09 (10-6)
10. Angels and Demons (May 15)
Plot: When Robert Langdon (Tom Hanks) discovers evidence of the resurgence of an ancient secret brotherhood known as the Illuminati - the most powerful underground organization in history - he also faces a deadly threat to the existence of the secret organization's most despised enemy: the Catholic Church. When Langdon learns that the clock is ticking on an unstoppable Illuminati time bomb, he jets to Rome, where he joins forces with Vittoria Vetra, a beautiful and enigmatic Italian scientist. Embarking on a nonstop, action-packed hunt through sealed crypts, dangerous catacombs, deserted cathedrals, and even to the heart of the most secretive vault on earth, Langdon and Vetra will follow a 400-year-old trail of ancient symbols that mark the Vatican's only hope for survival.
Personal opinion: I'll be the first to admit that The Da Vinci Code was a flawed film. But Hanks and director Ron Howard are smart people and probably understood the problems people had with the film. I think they can correct those problems and make a much better sequel. Helping their cause is the fact that Angels and Demons was a much better book. I have my trepidations about this, but I want to believe it one will be good.
9. I Love You, Man (March 20)
Plot: Peter Klaven (Paul Rudd) is a successful real estate agent who, upon getting engaged to the woman of his dreams, Zooey (Rashida Jones), discovers, to his dismay and chagrin, that he has no male friend close enough to serve as his Best Man. Peter immediately sets out to rectify the situation, embarking on a series of bizarre and awkward "man-dates," before meeting Sydney Fife (Jason Segel), a charming, opinionated man with whom he instantly bonds. But the closer the two men get, the more Peter's relationship with Zooey suffers, ultimately forcing him to choose between his fiancee and his new found "bro," in a story that comically explores what it truly means to be a "friend."
Personal opinion: I pretty much gave my two cents on this a few weeks ago when I posted the trailer. If you look at the cast, it has an all-star lineup of comedic actors. I don't see how this can miss. What will be interesting to see though is that this is the third film on my list scheduled to come out on March 20th. Either one of those films is terrible or someone will be changing dates. Only time will tell which it is.
8. State of Play (April 17)
Plot: Oscar® winner Russell Crowe leads an all-star cast in a blistering thriller about a rising congressman and an investigative journalist embroiled in an case of seemingly unrelated, brutal murders. Crowe plays D.C. reporter Cal McCaffrey, whose street smarts lead him to untangle a mystery of murder and collusion among some of the nation's most promising political and corporate figures in "State of Play," from acclaimed director Kevin Macdonald ("The Last King of Scotland").
Personal opinion: This is a remake of a British miniseries which was widely acclaimed. So with solid source material and an A-list cast which also features Ben Affleck, Rachel McAdams, Jason Bateman, and Helen Mirren this seems like it'll be an excellent thriller that comes out just before the summer season begins. Based on the trailer, it seems like this is a perfect role for Crowe, who almost always does great work.
7. Year One (June 19)
Plot: When a couple of lazy hunter-gatherers (Jack Black and Michael Cera) are banished from their primitive village, they set off on an epic journey through the ancient world in Columbia Pictures' comedy "Year One." Harold Ramis directs. The screenplay is by Harold Ramis & Gene Stupnitsky & Lee Eisenberg ("The Office") from a story by Harold Ramis. The film is produced by Judd Apatow, Harold Ramis, and Clayton Townsend.
Personal opinion: If you're not already sold based on that plot description, then I present this photo from EW to seal the deal:
Case closed. I cannot wait for this one!
6. The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3 (June 12)
Plot: In "The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3," Denzel Washington stars as New York City subway dispatcher Walter Garber, whose ordinary day is thrown into chaos by an audacious crime: the hijacking of a subway train. John Travolta stars as Ryder, the criminal mastermind who, as leader of a highly-armed gang of four, threatens to execute the train's passengers unless a large ransom is paid within one hour. As the tension mounts beneath his feet, Garber employs his vast knowledge of the subway system in a battle to outwit Ryder and save the hostages. But there's one riddle Garber can't solve: even if the thieves get the money, how can they possibly escape?
Personal opinion: This is a remake of a 1974 film. I never saw that one, but I'm really intrigued by the plot. When you factor in big name stars like Washington and Travolta, it seems like you have the formula for a winner. It also helps that Washington is working once again with director Tony Scott. That combination almost always produces a film that I want to see. Amongst a summer full of noisy action movies, I'm hoping this will be the smart thriller that works as effective counter-programming.
Plot: When Robert Langdon (Tom Hanks) discovers evidence of the resurgence of an ancient secret brotherhood known as the Illuminati - the most powerful underground organization in history - he also faces a deadly threat to the existence of the secret organization's most despised enemy: the Catholic Church. When Langdon learns that the clock is ticking on an unstoppable Illuminati time bomb, he jets to Rome, where he joins forces with Vittoria Vetra, a beautiful and enigmatic Italian scientist. Embarking on a nonstop, action-packed hunt through sealed crypts, dangerous catacombs, deserted cathedrals, and even to the heart of the most secretive vault on earth, Langdon and Vetra will follow a 400-year-old trail of ancient symbols that mark the Vatican's only hope for survival.
Personal opinion: I'll be the first to admit that The Da Vinci Code was a flawed film. But Hanks and director Ron Howard are smart people and probably understood the problems people had with the film. I think they can correct those problems and make a much better sequel. Helping their cause is the fact that Angels and Demons was a much better book. I have my trepidations about this, but I want to believe it one will be good.
9. I Love You, Man (March 20)
Plot: Peter Klaven (Paul Rudd) is a successful real estate agent who, upon getting engaged to the woman of his dreams, Zooey (Rashida Jones), discovers, to his dismay and chagrin, that he has no male friend close enough to serve as his Best Man. Peter immediately sets out to rectify the situation, embarking on a series of bizarre and awkward "man-dates," before meeting Sydney Fife (Jason Segel), a charming, opinionated man with whom he instantly bonds. But the closer the two men get, the more Peter's relationship with Zooey suffers, ultimately forcing him to choose between his fiancee and his new found "bro," in a story that comically explores what it truly means to be a "friend."
Personal opinion: I pretty much gave my two cents on this a few weeks ago when I posted the trailer. If you look at the cast, it has an all-star lineup of comedic actors. I don't see how this can miss. What will be interesting to see though is that this is the third film on my list scheduled to come out on March 20th. Either one of those films is terrible or someone will be changing dates. Only time will tell which it is.
8. State of Play (April 17)
Plot: Oscar® winner Russell Crowe leads an all-star cast in a blistering thriller about a rising congressman and an investigative journalist embroiled in an case of seemingly unrelated, brutal murders. Crowe plays D.C. reporter Cal McCaffrey, whose street smarts lead him to untangle a mystery of murder and collusion among some of the nation's most promising political and corporate figures in "State of Play," from acclaimed director Kevin Macdonald ("The Last King of Scotland").
Personal opinion: This is a remake of a British miniseries which was widely acclaimed. So with solid source material and an A-list cast which also features Ben Affleck, Rachel McAdams, Jason Bateman, and Helen Mirren this seems like it'll be an excellent thriller that comes out just before the summer season begins. Based on the trailer, it seems like this is a perfect role for Crowe, who almost always does great work.
7. Year One (June 19)
Plot: When a couple of lazy hunter-gatherers (Jack Black and Michael Cera) are banished from their primitive village, they set off on an epic journey through the ancient world in Columbia Pictures' comedy "Year One." Harold Ramis directs. The screenplay is by Harold Ramis & Gene Stupnitsky & Lee Eisenberg ("The Office") from a story by Harold Ramis. The film is produced by Judd Apatow, Harold Ramis, and Clayton Townsend.
Personal opinion: If you're not already sold based on that plot description, then I present this photo from EW to seal the deal:
Case closed. I cannot wait for this one!
6. The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3 (June 12)
Plot: In "The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3," Denzel Washington stars as New York City subway dispatcher Walter Garber, whose ordinary day is thrown into chaos by an audacious crime: the hijacking of a subway train. John Travolta stars as Ryder, the criminal mastermind who, as leader of a highly-armed gang of four, threatens to execute the train's passengers unless a large ransom is paid within one hour. As the tension mounts beneath his feet, Garber employs his vast knowledge of the subway system in a battle to outwit Ryder and save the hostages. But there's one riddle Garber can't solve: even if the thieves get the money, how can they possibly escape?
Personal opinion: This is a remake of a 1974 film. I never saw that one, but I'm really intrigued by the plot. When you factor in big name stars like Washington and Travolta, it seems like you have the formula for a winner. It also helps that Washington is working once again with director Tony Scott. That combination almost always produces a film that I want to see. Amongst a summer full of noisy action movies, I'm hoping this will be the smart thriller that works as effective counter-programming.
The Tribe continues to make moves
From MLB.com:
This is a low-risk venture in my opinion. No one expects much from Pavano after his injury-plagued run in New York, but if it can produce in the role of veteran starter, then it's a bonus for the Tribe. We have plenty of options for the 3-5 spots in the rotation, so we're bound to find three that will work.
I will say this though, the Indians may not have made the flashiest moves this offseason, but Mark Shapiro has addressed every weakness that he identified when last season ended. If these moves work out, he'll be heralded as a genius. And if they don't work out, then this team may be forever doomed. I'm hoping for the more positive outcome.
By the way, just about a month until pitchers and catchers report for spring training! :)
Looking to bolster their starting rotation, the Indians are taking a chance on Carl Pavano.
Pavano and the Indians have agreed to a one-year Major League deal that was to be announced Tuesday afternoon. The deal does not include an option. Financial terms were not immediately available.
Pavano, who turns 33 on Thursday, is coming off a disappointing, injury-plagued four-year stint with the Yankees. With New York in 2008, he appeared in seven games and was 4-2 with a 5.77 ERA in 34 1/3 innings.
Over the course of his four-year, $40 million deal with the Yanks, Pavano appeared in just 26 games. He threw 145 2/3 innings over a four-year span. He missed all of 2006 because of injury. He broke in with the Montreal Expos in 1998.
The Indians designated first baseman Mike Aubrey for assignment to make room for Pavano on the 40-man roster.
This is a low-risk venture in my opinion. No one expects much from Pavano after his injury-plagued run in New York, but if it can produce in the role of veteran starter, then it's a bonus for the Tribe. We have plenty of options for the 3-5 spots in the rotation, so we're bound to find three that will work.
I will say this though, the Indians may not have made the flashiest moves this offseason, but Mark Shapiro has addressed every weakness that he identified when last season ended. If these moves work out, he'll be heralded as a genius. And if they don't work out, then this team may be forever doomed. I'm hoping for the more positive outcome.
By the way, just about a month until pitchers and catchers report for spring training! :)
Monday, January 5, 2009
30 Must See Movies for '09 (15-11)
15. Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (June 26)
Plot: In the highly-anticipated "Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen," debuting June 26, 2009, Sam Witwicky (Shia LaBeouf) again joins with the Autobots® against their sworn enemies, the Decepticons®. Michael Bay directs from a screenplay by Ehren Kruger & Roberto Orci & Alex Kurtzman.
Personal opinion: Most people know that I was not crazy about the first Transformers movie. And unlike some sequels, I highly doubt that they will be correcting any of the flaws that I identified in the original. But regardless of what I think, this will undoubtably do big business this summer and I know a lot of people are really excited for it. And even for all my complaining, I'm sure I'll see it as well, even if the overrated Shia LeBeouf and dead-behind-the-eyes Megan Fox are back.
14. Land of the Lost (June 5)
Plot: Space-time vortexes suck! Will Ferrell stars as has-been scientist Dr. Rick Marshall, sucked into one and spat back through time. Way back. Now, Marshall has no weapons, few skills and questionable smarts to survive in an alternate universe full of marauding dinosaurs and fantastic creatures from beyond our world - a place of spectacular sights and super-scaled comedy known as the Land of the Lost. Sucked alongside him for the adventure are crack-smart research assistant Holly (Anna Friel) and a redneck survivalist (Danny McBride) named Will.
Personal opinion: Usually Will Ferrell movies are guaranteed winners in my book, but I have my reservations about this one. I never saw the original Land of the Lost TV show, so I don't have a strong connection to the source material. In addition, Will is lacking a decent supporting cast. I am not fond of McBride and I'm not real familiar with Friel's work. Still, if the movie is as zany as the TV show supposedly was, this could be a fun romp.
13. Shutter Island (TBA)
Plot: From Oscar®-winning director Martin Scorsese, "Shutter Island" is the story of two U.S. marshals, Teddy Daniels (Leonardo DiCaprio) and Chuck Aule (Mark Ruffalo), who are summoned to a remote and barren island off the cost of Massachusetts to investigate the mysterious disappearance of a murderess from the island's fortress-like hospital for the criminally insane.
Personal opinion: Man, this has the makings of a great film. Directed by Scorsese and has an all-star cast led by Dicaprio. The film is also based on a Dennis Lehane novel, who also wrote Gone Baby Gone and Mystic River. My only concern is that it was originally scheduled for release in October, but is now listed as To Be Announced. Let's hope this doesn't get pushed back to 2010. If it comes out this year, it sounds like it'll be the perfect fall movie: dark and suspenseful. And if it lives up to its pedigree, it also sounds like it could be an Oscar contender as well.
12. X-Men Origins: Wolverine (May 1)
Plot: Leading up to the events of "X-Men," "X-Men Origins: Wolverine" tells the story of Wolverine's epically violent and romantic past, his complex relationship with Victor Creed, and the ominous Weapon X program. Along the way, Wolverine encounters many mutants, both familiar and new, including surprise appearances by several legends of the X-Men universe.
Personal opinion: I really enjoyed the first two X-Men movies and the third would have been all right had Brett Ratner not been directing it. But as for this Wolverine prequel, I'm not as excited for some reason. Even the trailer didn't get me all that excited for this. Hopefully there will be enough other interesting characters to make this movie worthwhile because I don't want two hours of Hugh Jackman grunting and baring his claws. I will say that I'm excited to see Gambit finally appear, but is it a case of too little, too late?
11. Up (May 29)
Plot: From Disney•Pixar comes "Up," a comedy adventure about 78-year-old balloon salesman Carl Fredricksen, who finally fulfills his lifelong dream of a great adventure when he ties thousands of balloons to his house and flies away to the wilds of South America. But he discovers all too late that his biggest nightmare has stowed away on the trip: an overly optimistic 9-year-old Wilderness Explorer named Russell. From the Academy Award-nominated director Pete Docter ("Monsters, Inc."), Disney•Pixar's "Up" invites you on a hilarious journey into a lost world, with the least likely duo on Earth.
Personal opinion: If Pixar has a new film out, you know I'll be excited about it. Those inventive computer animators have come up with yet another unique idea here and I have no doubt that it will be just as funny and heartwarming as their previous entries. At this point, I really don't need to say too much more. The Pixar name pretty much sells itself. I will just say that, given the flying across the globe plot, this looks to be another gorgeous film that will be as much to watch for its visuals as it will be for its story.
Plot: In the highly-anticipated "Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen," debuting June 26, 2009, Sam Witwicky (Shia LaBeouf) again joins with the Autobots® against their sworn enemies, the Decepticons®. Michael Bay directs from a screenplay by Ehren Kruger & Roberto Orci & Alex Kurtzman.
Personal opinion: Most people know that I was not crazy about the first Transformers movie. And unlike some sequels, I highly doubt that they will be correcting any of the flaws that I identified in the original. But regardless of what I think, this will undoubtably do big business this summer and I know a lot of people are really excited for it. And even for all my complaining, I'm sure I'll see it as well, even if the overrated Shia LeBeouf and dead-behind-the-eyes Megan Fox are back.
14. Land of the Lost (June 5)
Plot: Space-time vortexes suck! Will Ferrell stars as has-been scientist Dr. Rick Marshall, sucked into one and spat back through time. Way back. Now, Marshall has no weapons, few skills and questionable smarts to survive in an alternate universe full of marauding dinosaurs and fantastic creatures from beyond our world - a place of spectacular sights and super-scaled comedy known as the Land of the Lost. Sucked alongside him for the adventure are crack-smart research assistant Holly (Anna Friel) and a redneck survivalist (Danny McBride) named Will.
Personal opinion: Usually Will Ferrell movies are guaranteed winners in my book, but I have my reservations about this one. I never saw the original Land of the Lost TV show, so I don't have a strong connection to the source material. In addition, Will is lacking a decent supporting cast. I am not fond of McBride and I'm not real familiar with Friel's work. Still, if the movie is as zany as the TV show supposedly was, this could be a fun romp.
13. Shutter Island (TBA)
Plot: From Oscar®-winning director Martin Scorsese, "Shutter Island" is the story of two U.S. marshals, Teddy Daniels (Leonardo DiCaprio) and Chuck Aule (Mark Ruffalo), who are summoned to a remote and barren island off the cost of Massachusetts to investigate the mysterious disappearance of a murderess from the island's fortress-like hospital for the criminally insane.
Personal opinion: Man, this has the makings of a great film. Directed by Scorsese and has an all-star cast led by Dicaprio. The film is also based on a Dennis Lehane novel, who also wrote Gone Baby Gone and Mystic River. My only concern is that it was originally scheduled for release in October, but is now listed as To Be Announced. Let's hope this doesn't get pushed back to 2010. If it comes out this year, it sounds like it'll be the perfect fall movie: dark and suspenseful. And if it lives up to its pedigree, it also sounds like it could be an Oscar contender as well.
12. X-Men Origins: Wolverine (May 1)
Plot: Leading up to the events of "X-Men," "X-Men Origins: Wolverine" tells the story of Wolverine's epically violent and romantic past, his complex relationship with Victor Creed, and the ominous Weapon X program. Along the way, Wolverine encounters many mutants, both familiar and new, including surprise appearances by several legends of the X-Men universe.
Personal opinion: I really enjoyed the first two X-Men movies and the third would have been all right had Brett Ratner not been directing it. But as for this Wolverine prequel, I'm not as excited for some reason. Even the trailer didn't get me all that excited for this. Hopefully there will be enough other interesting characters to make this movie worthwhile because I don't want two hours of Hugh Jackman grunting and baring his claws. I will say that I'm excited to see Gambit finally appear, but is it a case of too little, too late?
11. Up (May 29)
Plot: From Disney•Pixar comes "Up," a comedy adventure about 78-year-old balloon salesman Carl Fredricksen, who finally fulfills his lifelong dream of a great adventure when he ties thousands of balloons to his house and flies away to the wilds of South America. But he discovers all too late that his biggest nightmare has stowed away on the trip: an overly optimistic 9-year-old Wilderness Explorer named Russell. From the Academy Award-nominated director Pete Docter ("Monsters, Inc."), Disney•Pixar's "Up" invites you on a hilarious journey into a lost world, with the least likely duo on Earth.
Personal opinion: If Pixar has a new film out, you know I'll be excited about it. Those inventive computer animators have come up with yet another unique idea here and I have no doubt that it will be just as funny and heartwarming as their previous entries. At this point, I really don't need to say too much more. The Pixar name pretty much sells itself. I will just say that, given the flying across the globe plot, this looks to be another gorgeous film that will be as much to watch for its visuals as it will be for its story.
NMR: Flawless
You probably don't remember this film, even though it was just in theaters last March as it came and went with little fanfare. Starring Demi Moore and Michael Caine, Flawless is a heist movie involving the two leads trying to stead diamonds from the London Diamond Company during the 1960s. The film is loosely based on real events. If you are a fan of the heist movie genre, you may be slightly disappointed in this one. The thrills are kept to a minimum and given the lack of security in the 60s as compared today, the effort to steal the diamonds isn't all that difficult. Still, the film does deliver a couple of surprises that make you invested in seeing how things play out in the end. Demi Moore's performance here is nothing noteworthy, but as usual, Caine is a delight here and delivers a fun performance. There is no urgency to see this film, but if you're looking for a heist movie that you haven't already seen, this will do suitably. Rating: ***
Sunday, January 4, 2009
30 Must See Movies for '09 (20-16)
20. The Hangover (June 12)
Plot: Two days before his wedding, Doug and his three friends drive to Las Vegas for a blow-out bachelor party they'll never forget. But, in fact, when the three groomsmen wake up the next morning, they can't remember a thing. For some reason, they find a tiger in the bathroom and a six-month-old baby in the closet of their suite at Caesars Palace. The one thing they can't find is Doug. With no clue as to what transpired and little time to spare, the trio must retrace their hazy steps and all their bad decisions in order to figure out where things went wrong and hopefully get Doug back to L.A. in time to walk down the aisle.
Personal opinion: This is being directed by Todd Phillips, who did Old School. After a disappointing effort with School for Scoundrels, I'm hoping this one is a return to form. With the combination of Ed Helms and Zach Galifinakis, I have a hard time believing this one won't be funny. But without seeing a trailer yet, I can't know for sure, which is why it isn't higher on the list.
19. Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian (May 22)
Plot: It's a new "Night" and "Museum" for Ben Stiller, who is joined by several other stars from the original film, as well as new characters from history -- including Amy Adams as famed aviatrix Amelia Earhart, Hank Azaria as villainous Egyptian pharaoh Ka Mun Rah, Christopher Guest as Russian tyrant Ivan the Terrible and Alain Chabat as Napoleon. Owen Wilson is back as cowboy Jedediah, and Robin Williams again rides into history as Teddy Roosevelt.
Personal opinion: The first one was fine, albeit somewhat tame I thought. Based on the teaser trailer, this one seems like your typical sequel, that is, more of the same. I do like the additions of Bill Hader and Hank Azaria, as they should up the humor in this one. I won't rush out to see it, but I'm sure there will be a lot of families that will. Let's just hope for their sake, that this film doesn't suffer the same fate as Narnia by having a successful first film open in the winter followed by a sequel that opens in the summer and flops.
18. Duplicity (March 20)
Plot: Oscar winner Julia Roberts and Clive Owen reunite for "Duplicity," from writer/director Tony Gilroy (seven-time Oscar-nominated "Michael Clayton"). In the film, they star as spies-turned-corporate operatives in the midst of a clandestine love affair. When they find themselves embroiled in a high-stakes espionage game, they discover the toughest part of the job is deciding how much to trust the one you love.
Personal opinion: Not only is this Clive Owen's second appearance on the list, but it's also the second film to appear on the list that will open on March 20. This one seems like it has the makings for a really cool film. Aside from the two leads, you have Tom Wilkinson and Paul Giammati here lending their support. Given how great Tony Gilroy's first directorial effort was, I'm really interested to see what he does for a follow-up here. The spy comedy can be a tricky genre to do right, but all signs thus far point to this one being a winner.
17. Terminator Salvation (May 22)
Post: In the highly anticipated new installment of "The Terminator" film franchise, set in post-apocalyptic 2018, Christian Bale stars as John Connor, the man fated to lead the human resistance against Skynet and its army of Terminators. But the future Connor was raised to believe in is altered in part by the appearance of Marcus Wright (Sam Worthington), a stranger whose last memory is of being on death row. Connor must decide whether Marcus has been sent from the future, or rescued from the past. As Skynet prepares its final onslaught, Connor and Marcus both embark on an odyssey that takes them into the heart of Skynet's operations, where they uncover the terrible secret behind the possible annihilation of mankind.
Personal opinion: I'll state up front that I've never been a big fan of the Terminator franchise. In fact, I've never seen either the third film or the current TV series. So why is this even on the list, let alone at #17? Simple, Christian Bale. Hiring him to play an adult John Connor immediately raised the franchise's quality. We've seen what he's done for Batman, now I'm curious to see what he'll do for this film. It still may not be my cup of tea, but they've at least now got my attention. Here's hoping I won't be disappointed.
16. Adventureland (March 27)
Plot: "Adventureland" is a comedy set in the summer of 1987 and centered around a recent college grad (Eisenberg) who takes a nowhere job at his local amusement park, only to find it's the perfect course to get him prepared for the real world.
Personal opinion: This one sort of snuck up on me. I actually didn't have it on my original list, but the trailer was just released and I discovered that this one has real possibility. It certainly has the comedic pedigree with Greg Mottola (Superbad) directing, and people like Bill Hader, Kristin Wiig, and Ryan Reynolds all in it. I'm not crazy about the March release date, but let's hope it has the quality of a summer release.
Plot: Two days before his wedding, Doug and his three friends drive to Las Vegas for a blow-out bachelor party they'll never forget. But, in fact, when the three groomsmen wake up the next morning, they can't remember a thing. For some reason, they find a tiger in the bathroom and a six-month-old baby in the closet of their suite at Caesars Palace. The one thing they can't find is Doug. With no clue as to what transpired and little time to spare, the trio must retrace their hazy steps and all their bad decisions in order to figure out where things went wrong and hopefully get Doug back to L.A. in time to walk down the aisle.
Personal opinion: This is being directed by Todd Phillips, who did Old School. After a disappointing effort with School for Scoundrels, I'm hoping this one is a return to form. With the combination of Ed Helms and Zach Galifinakis, I have a hard time believing this one won't be funny. But without seeing a trailer yet, I can't know for sure, which is why it isn't higher on the list.
19. Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian (May 22)
Plot: It's a new "Night" and "Museum" for Ben Stiller, who is joined by several other stars from the original film, as well as new characters from history -- including Amy Adams as famed aviatrix Amelia Earhart, Hank Azaria as villainous Egyptian pharaoh Ka Mun Rah, Christopher Guest as Russian tyrant Ivan the Terrible and Alain Chabat as Napoleon. Owen Wilson is back as cowboy Jedediah, and Robin Williams again rides into history as Teddy Roosevelt.
Personal opinion: The first one was fine, albeit somewhat tame I thought. Based on the teaser trailer, this one seems like your typical sequel, that is, more of the same. I do like the additions of Bill Hader and Hank Azaria, as they should up the humor in this one. I won't rush out to see it, but I'm sure there will be a lot of families that will. Let's just hope for their sake, that this film doesn't suffer the same fate as Narnia by having a successful first film open in the winter followed by a sequel that opens in the summer and flops.
18. Duplicity (March 20)
Plot: Oscar winner Julia Roberts and Clive Owen reunite for "Duplicity," from writer/director Tony Gilroy (seven-time Oscar-nominated "Michael Clayton"). In the film, they star as spies-turned-corporate operatives in the midst of a clandestine love affair. When they find themselves embroiled in a high-stakes espionage game, they discover the toughest part of the job is deciding how much to trust the one you love.
Personal opinion: Not only is this Clive Owen's second appearance on the list, but it's also the second film to appear on the list that will open on March 20. This one seems like it has the makings for a really cool film. Aside from the two leads, you have Tom Wilkinson and Paul Giammati here lending their support. Given how great Tony Gilroy's first directorial effort was, I'm really interested to see what he does for a follow-up here. The spy comedy can be a tricky genre to do right, but all signs thus far point to this one being a winner.
17. Terminator Salvation (May 22)
Post: In the highly anticipated new installment of "The Terminator" film franchise, set in post-apocalyptic 2018, Christian Bale stars as John Connor, the man fated to lead the human resistance against Skynet and its army of Terminators. But the future Connor was raised to believe in is altered in part by the appearance of Marcus Wright (Sam Worthington), a stranger whose last memory is of being on death row. Connor must decide whether Marcus has been sent from the future, or rescued from the past. As Skynet prepares its final onslaught, Connor and Marcus both embark on an odyssey that takes them into the heart of Skynet's operations, where they uncover the terrible secret behind the possible annihilation of mankind.
Personal opinion: I'll state up front that I've never been a big fan of the Terminator franchise. In fact, I've never seen either the third film or the current TV series. So why is this even on the list, let alone at #17? Simple, Christian Bale. Hiring him to play an adult John Connor immediately raised the franchise's quality. We've seen what he's done for Batman, now I'm curious to see what he'll do for this film. It still may not be my cup of tea, but they've at least now got my attention. Here's hoping I won't be disappointed.
16. Adventureland (March 27)
Plot: "Adventureland" is a comedy set in the summer of 1987 and centered around a recent college grad (Eisenberg) who takes a nowhere job at his local amusement park, only to find it's the perfect course to get him prepared for the real world.
Personal opinion: This one sort of snuck up on me. I actually didn't have it on my original list, but the trailer was just released and I discovered that this one has real possibility. It certainly has the comedic pedigree with Greg Mottola (Superbad) directing, and people like Bill Hader, Kristin Wiig, and Ryan Reynolds all in it. I'm not crazy about the March release date, but let's hope it has the quality of a summer release.
NMR: Where in the World is Osama Bin Laden?
I should learn never to make declarative statements again. The other night I told a friend that I've never seen a bad documentary and sure enough two days later, I stumble upon one. This is directed by Morgan Spurlock, the man behind the immensely entertaining and eye-opening documentary, Super Size Me. None of those qualities are found in this film, however. Concerned about bringing a baby into such a scary world, Spurlock sets off for the Middle East in search of the elusive terrorist. It's pretty obvious he won't find him, otherwise he probably still wouldn't be alive. But the film isn't really about finding Bin Laden, instead it showcases Muslim people and how they don't actually hate Americans, just American policy. Wow, really? This film doesn't break any ground and proves to be rather pointless. With no real insight revealed, this simply becomes a really bad vacation video. Unless like Bin Laden, you've been living in a cave for the past 8 years, there's nothing you'll learn by watching this movie. Rating: **
Friday, January 2, 2009
30 Must See Movies for '09 (25-21)
25. Watchmen (March 6)
Plot: A complex, multi-layered mystery adventure, "Watchmen" is set in an alternate 1985 America in which costumed superheroes are part of the fabric of everyday society, and the "Doomsday Clock" - which charts the USA's tension with the Soviet Union - is permanently set at five minutes to midnight. When one of his former colleagues is murdered, the washed-up but no less determined masked vigilante Rorschach sets out to uncover a plot to kill and discredit all past and present superheroes. As he reconnects with his former crime-fighting legion - a ragtag group of retired superheroes, only one of whom has true powers - Rorschach glimpses a wide-ranging and disturbing conspiracy with links to their shared past and catastrophic consequences for the future. Their mission is to watch over humanity...but who is watching the Watchmen?
Personal opinion: I've never read this acclaimed graphic novel, but the concept of it seems interesting and it appears to have several cool, unique characters. This one falls so far down the list because there's a chance it may not actually come out this year. There is currently a major lawsuit over who truly owns the distribution rights to these characters. WB is trying to release this film, but a judge recently ruled that Fox owns the rights. Hopefully this will get settled and the film will come out, but things are really up in the air right now. As they say in the news business, more on this to come.
24. 2012 (July 10)
Plot: Never before has a date in history been so significant to so many cultures, so many religions, scientists, and governments. "2012" is an epic adventure about a global cataclysm that brings an end to the world and tells of the heroic struggle of the survivors.
Personal opinion: From the looks of things, this seems like it might as well be called The Day After Tomorrow 2. Directed by the same guy, 2012 looks to focus heavy on visual effects and little of quality dialogue. This may not be for everyone, but I found The Day After Tomorrow to be escapist fun, so I'm hoping for the same with this.
23. The International (February 13)
Plot: In "The International," a gripping thriller, Interpol Agent Louis Salinger (Clive Owen) and Manhattan Assistant District Attorney Eleanor Whitman (Naomi Watts) are determined to bring to justice one of the world's most powerful banks. Uncovering myriad and reprehensible illegal activities, Salinger and Whitman follow the money from Berlin to Milan to New York to Istanbul. Finding themselves in a high-stakes chase across the globe, their relentless tenacity puts their own lives at risk as their targets will stop at nothing – even murder – to continue financing terror and war.
Personal opinion: This won't be the first time you'll be seeing Clive Owen on this list. While this movie seems to have all the makings for a decent action thiller, I'm still not sold on Clive Owen as a lead actor. If the reviews for this one are good though, this could be your best option during a time of the year that typically doesn't have many blockbusters.
22. Monsters vs. Aliens (March 27)
Plot: When California girl Susan Murphy is unwittingly clobbered by a meteor full of outer space gunk on her wedding day, she mysteriously grows to 49-feet-11-inches tall. The military jumps into action and Susan is captured and secreted away to a covert government compound. There, she is renamed Ginormica and placed in confinement with a ragtag group of Monsters: the brilliant but insect-headed Dr. Cockroach, Ph.D.; the macho half-ape, half-fish The Missing Link; the gelatinous and indestructible B.O.B.; and the 350-foot grub called Insectosaurus. Their confinement is cut short, however, when a mysterious alien robot lands on Earth and begins storming the country. In a moment of desperation, the President is persuaded to enlist the motley crew of Monsters to combat the Alien Robot and save the world from imminent destruction.
Personal opinion: Dreamworks looks to continue their push to rival Pixar in terms of quality computer animated films. This one not only has a cute concept, but also has a strong cast of voice actors who look like they'll be able to really add something to their characters. I probably won't see this immediately, but I think this one will be popular with the kids.
21. G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra
Plot: From the Egyptian desert to deep below the polar ice caps, the elite G.I. JOE team uses the latest in next-generation spy and military equipment to fight the corrupt arms dealer Destro and the growing threat of the mysterious Cobra organization to prevent them from plunging the world into chaos. "G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra." is directed by Stephen Sommers ("The Mummy," "The Mummy Returns").
Personal opinion: You have to wonder why it's taken so long for them to make a live action G.I. Joe movie. But with the success of Transformers, this was a no-brainer. There are no real big name actors in this, which could either be a big mistake or a wise move. Stephen Sommers has shown he can make some solid popcorn fare and with this being the only real major release in August, this could be the final blockbuster of the summer. Then again, if this is anything less than spectacular, it may get lost in the shuffle amongst the rest of the bigger summer blockbusters.
Plot: A complex, multi-layered mystery adventure, "Watchmen" is set in an alternate 1985 America in which costumed superheroes are part of the fabric of everyday society, and the "Doomsday Clock" - which charts the USA's tension with the Soviet Union - is permanently set at five minutes to midnight. When one of his former colleagues is murdered, the washed-up but no less determined masked vigilante Rorschach sets out to uncover a plot to kill and discredit all past and present superheroes. As he reconnects with his former crime-fighting legion - a ragtag group of retired superheroes, only one of whom has true powers - Rorschach glimpses a wide-ranging and disturbing conspiracy with links to their shared past and catastrophic consequences for the future. Their mission is to watch over humanity...but who is watching the Watchmen?
Personal opinion: I've never read this acclaimed graphic novel, but the concept of it seems interesting and it appears to have several cool, unique characters. This one falls so far down the list because there's a chance it may not actually come out this year. There is currently a major lawsuit over who truly owns the distribution rights to these characters. WB is trying to release this film, but a judge recently ruled that Fox owns the rights. Hopefully this will get settled and the film will come out, but things are really up in the air right now. As they say in the news business, more on this to come.
24. 2012 (July 10)
Plot: Never before has a date in history been so significant to so many cultures, so many religions, scientists, and governments. "2012" is an epic adventure about a global cataclysm that brings an end to the world and tells of the heroic struggle of the survivors.
Personal opinion: From the looks of things, this seems like it might as well be called The Day After Tomorrow 2. Directed by the same guy, 2012 looks to focus heavy on visual effects and little of quality dialogue. This may not be for everyone, but I found The Day After Tomorrow to be escapist fun, so I'm hoping for the same with this.
23. The International (February 13)
Plot: In "The International," a gripping thriller, Interpol Agent Louis Salinger (Clive Owen) and Manhattan Assistant District Attorney Eleanor Whitman (Naomi Watts) are determined to bring to justice one of the world's most powerful banks. Uncovering myriad and reprehensible illegal activities, Salinger and Whitman follow the money from Berlin to Milan to New York to Istanbul. Finding themselves in a high-stakes chase across the globe, their relentless tenacity puts their own lives at risk as their targets will stop at nothing – even murder – to continue financing terror and war.
Personal opinion: This won't be the first time you'll be seeing Clive Owen on this list. While this movie seems to have all the makings for a decent action thiller, I'm still not sold on Clive Owen as a lead actor. If the reviews for this one are good though, this could be your best option during a time of the year that typically doesn't have many blockbusters.
22. Monsters vs. Aliens (March 27)
Plot: When California girl Susan Murphy is unwittingly clobbered by a meteor full of outer space gunk on her wedding day, she mysteriously grows to 49-feet-11-inches tall. The military jumps into action and Susan is captured and secreted away to a covert government compound. There, she is renamed Ginormica and placed in confinement with a ragtag group of Monsters: the brilliant but insect-headed Dr. Cockroach, Ph.D.; the macho half-ape, half-fish The Missing Link; the gelatinous and indestructible B.O.B.; and the 350-foot grub called Insectosaurus. Their confinement is cut short, however, when a mysterious alien robot lands on Earth and begins storming the country. In a moment of desperation, the President is persuaded to enlist the motley crew of Monsters to combat the Alien Robot and save the world from imminent destruction.
Personal opinion: Dreamworks looks to continue their push to rival Pixar in terms of quality computer animated films. This one not only has a cute concept, but also has a strong cast of voice actors who look like they'll be able to really add something to their characters. I probably won't see this immediately, but I think this one will be popular with the kids.
21. G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra
Plot: From the Egyptian desert to deep below the polar ice caps, the elite G.I. JOE team uses the latest in next-generation spy and military equipment to fight the corrupt arms dealer Destro and the growing threat of the mysterious Cobra organization to prevent them from plunging the world into chaos. "G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra." is directed by Stephen Sommers ("The Mummy," "The Mummy Returns").
Personal opinion: You have to wonder why it's taken so long for them to make a live action G.I. Joe movie. But with the success of Transformers, this was a no-brainer. There are no real big name actors in this, which could either be a big mistake or a wise move. Stephen Sommers has shown he can make some solid popcorn fare and with this being the only real major release in August, this could be the final blockbuster of the summer. Then again, if this is anything less than spectacular, it may get lost in the shuffle amongst the rest of the bigger summer blockbusters.
Thursday, January 1, 2009
30 Must See Movies for '09 (30-26)
To ring in the new year, I thought I would give everyone a preview of the big films that I'm looking forward to this year. Over the next week, I'll post five movies a day leading up to #1. So without further ado, let's get the countdown started...
30. Avatar (Dec. 18)
Plot: "Avatar" tells the story of an ex-Marine, thrust unwillingly into an effort to settle and exploit an exotic planet rich in bio-diversity, who eventually crosses over to lead the indigenous race in a battle for survival.
Personal opinion: This will be James Cameron's first film since Titanic, so the expectations are high here. The story doesn't particularly intrigue me, but given Cameron's talents and the long layoff, I am a bit intrigued to see what he produces. Early reports say this film could revolutionize the way films are made. So at least people aren't setting the bar too high for this movie.
29. The Road (TBD)
Plot: Academy Award nominee Viggo Mortensen, Academy Award winners Robert Duvall and Charlize Theron, Guy Pearce and 12-year-old Kodi Smit McPhee star in the big-screen adaptation of Cormac McCarthy's best-selling, Pulitzer Prize-winning novel, "The Road" – the story of a man (Mortensen) and his young son (Smit-McPhee) traveling through a desperate, post-apocalyptic world.
Personal opinion: This was originally scheduled to come out this past November. No word if it was delayed for production reasons or as a result of the strike. Delays are never a good sign, but given the pedigree of the cast and the fact that it's based on an award winning book, I remain mildly interested in this one. Once a release date is announced, we should have a better idea if this film is in trouble or not.
28. Star Trek (May 8)
Plot: From director J.J. Abrams ("Mission: Impossible III," "Lost" and "Alias") and screenwriters Roberto Orci & Alex Kurtzman ("Transformers," "MI: III") comes a new vision of the greatest space adventure of all time, "Star Trek," featuring a young, new crew venturing boldly where no man has gone before.
Personal opinion: I'll admit that I've never been a fan of the Star Trek franchise and the early previews of this reboot don't really excite me all that much either. However, I put this on the list for a couple of reasons: 1) I know there are a lot of other people who are very excited about this film and would feel it was an injustice if I didn't include it and 2) J.J. Abrams is directing this and he has rarely steered me wrong, so I may just give it a chance because of him.
27. Knowing (March 20)
Plot: Academy Award® Winner Nicolas Cage ("National Treasure: Book of Secrets," "Leaving Las Vegas") stars in "Knowing," a gripping action-thriller of global proportions about a professor who stumbles on terrifying predictions about the future—and sets out to prevent them from coming true.
Personal opinion: Nicolas Cage usually goes 50/50 in terms of box office hits. For every Ghost Rider, there's a Next. For every National Treasure, there's a Bangkok Dangerous. I believe he's due for a hit again, so let's hope this is it. The film has a cool preference as long as it doesn't become too cheesy like The Number 23.
26. The Brothers Bloom (May 29)
Plot: Academy Award winner® Rachel Weisz ("The Constant Gardener"), Academy Award® winner Adrien Brody ("The Pianist"), Mark Ruffalo ("Zodiac"), and Academy Award® nominee Rinko Kikuchi ("Babel") star in "The Brothers Bloom," a globe-trotting comedy about the last great adventure of the world's best con men.
Personal opinion: This is another film that was originally intended for '08. However, this one has been bumped several times, which doesn't bode well for the film's quality. However, the trailer I saw seems promising and the cast is solid. Until I start hearing reviews to the contrary, I'll still believe that this will be an entertaining film.
30. Avatar (Dec. 18)
Plot: "Avatar" tells the story of an ex-Marine, thrust unwillingly into an effort to settle and exploit an exotic planet rich in bio-diversity, who eventually crosses over to lead the indigenous race in a battle for survival.
Personal opinion: This will be James Cameron's first film since Titanic, so the expectations are high here. The story doesn't particularly intrigue me, but given Cameron's talents and the long layoff, I am a bit intrigued to see what he produces. Early reports say this film could revolutionize the way films are made. So at least people aren't setting the bar too high for this movie.
29. The Road (TBD)
Plot: Academy Award nominee Viggo Mortensen, Academy Award winners Robert Duvall and Charlize Theron, Guy Pearce and 12-year-old Kodi Smit McPhee star in the big-screen adaptation of Cormac McCarthy's best-selling, Pulitzer Prize-winning novel, "The Road" – the story of a man (Mortensen) and his young son (Smit-McPhee) traveling through a desperate, post-apocalyptic world.
Personal opinion: This was originally scheduled to come out this past November. No word if it was delayed for production reasons or as a result of the strike. Delays are never a good sign, but given the pedigree of the cast and the fact that it's based on an award winning book, I remain mildly interested in this one. Once a release date is announced, we should have a better idea if this film is in trouble or not.
28. Star Trek (May 8)
Plot: From director J.J. Abrams ("Mission: Impossible III," "Lost" and "Alias") and screenwriters Roberto Orci & Alex Kurtzman ("Transformers," "MI: III") comes a new vision of the greatest space adventure of all time, "Star Trek," featuring a young, new crew venturing boldly where no man has gone before.
Personal opinion: I'll admit that I've never been a fan of the Star Trek franchise and the early previews of this reboot don't really excite me all that much either. However, I put this on the list for a couple of reasons: 1) I know there are a lot of other people who are very excited about this film and would feel it was an injustice if I didn't include it and 2) J.J. Abrams is directing this and he has rarely steered me wrong, so I may just give it a chance because of him.
27. Knowing (March 20)
Plot: Academy Award® Winner Nicolas Cage ("National Treasure: Book of Secrets," "Leaving Las Vegas") stars in "Knowing," a gripping action-thriller of global proportions about a professor who stumbles on terrifying predictions about the future—and sets out to prevent them from coming true.
Personal opinion: Nicolas Cage usually goes 50/50 in terms of box office hits. For every Ghost Rider, there's a Next. For every National Treasure, there's a Bangkok Dangerous. I believe he's due for a hit again, so let's hope this is it. The film has a cool preference as long as it doesn't become too cheesy like The Number 23.
26. The Brothers Bloom (May 29)
Plot: Academy Award winner® Rachel Weisz ("The Constant Gardener"), Academy Award® winner Adrien Brody ("The Pianist"), Mark Ruffalo ("Zodiac"), and Academy Award® nominee Rinko Kikuchi ("Babel") star in "The Brothers Bloom," a globe-trotting comedy about the last great adventure of the world's best con men.
Personal opinion: This is another film that was originally intended for '08. However, this one has been bumped several times, which doesn't bode well for the film's quality. However, the trailer I saw seems promising and the cast is solid. Until I start hearing reviews to the contrary, I'll still believe that this will be an entertaining film.
Out with the old, in with the new
My very best to all of you who visit this blog in the new year. While '08 certainly had its highs and lows, I have big expectations for the new year, both for the country and personally. If all goes well I should be graduating in May and then actually having a real job for the first time this fall. Exciting times, indeed. I hope the new year brings health, happiness, and prosperity to all of you and I look forward to sharing those happy moments with each of you.
Keep checking back here throughout the year as I hope to continue to share news and opinions on everything I'm interested in!
Wednesday, December 31, 2008
Midseason TV report (Sundays)
Let's close out the year with a look at the final day of TV recaps, Sunday.
The Amazing Race: This easily was the worst cycle of this show in quite a while. While still heads and tails above most reality shows, TAR stumbled a bit this season as a result of some poor casting. There were very few likeable teams this time around. Even worse, most of the teams were terrible at playing the game. I've never seen so many misread or misunderstood clues in one season. The locales were nice, but then again, the show always does a nice job of finding unique places each time that truly represent this beautiful planet. The show will return again next spring and I'm hoping they'll have a better group of racers next time out.
The Simpsons: 20 years in, the show is what it is. It can't possibly be as good as it was in its glory days, but it seems they've brought some fresh blood in to help things feel fresh again. This season has had some ups and downs, but each episode still manages to yield some laughs from me. I particularly liked the most recent episode that involved Mr. Burns buying a basketball team. It was nice to see a full episode devoted to a character outside of the family. This show has created this wonderful world of characters, yet has reduced most of them to one-note jokes. Here's hoping with the new writers, new aspects of these fun characters will be explored.
Family Guy: You know, considering the fact that this show didn't return with new episodes after the strike ended last spring, you would have thought they would have had a ton of episodes brimming with good ideas coming into this new season. Instead, the show seemingly became even lazier, not even trying to cobble coherent plots together. If the pop culture references worked, then the show remains amusing, otherwise it's just a muddled mess. The standout episode of the season had to be the Surfin Bird episode, which I go back and forth on as to whether it was the funniest thing ever or the most annoying half hour of television ever made.
American Dad: It seems apparent that either Seth McFarlane has put most of his focus on this show or has much more capable running this one than Family Guy because it continues to be a much better show with intelligent humor and clever plotlines. Consider this had the stigma of being the bastard son of Family Guy for so long, it's funny to see how it has surpassed it in quality now. The biggest problem area for this show is Roger, who is great in small doses but grating when he takes over the show. It will be interesting to see how this show's quality is affecting once Seth's third show, The Cleveland Show makes it's debut next year.
The Amazing Race: This easily was the worst cycle of this show in quite a while. While still heads and tails above most reality shows, TAR stumbled a bit this season as a result of some poor casting. There were very few likeable teams this time around. Even worse, most of the teams were terrible at playing the game. I've never seen so many misread or misunderstood clues in one season. The locales were nice, but then again, the show always does a nice job of finding unique places each time that truly represent this beautiful planet. The show will return again next spring and I'm hoping they'll have a better group of racers next time out.
The Simpsons: 20 years in, the show is what it is. It can't possibly be as good as it was in its glory days, but it seems they've brought some fresh blood in to help things feel fresh again. This season has had some ups and downs, but each episode still manages to yield some laughs from me. I particularly liked the most recent episode that involved Mr. Burns buying a basketball team. It was nice to see a full episode devoted to a character outside of the family. This show has created this wonderful world of characters, yet has reduced most of them to one-note jokes. Here's hoping with the new writers, new aspects of these fun characters will be explored.
Family Guy: You know, considering the fact that this show didn't return with new episodes after the strike ended last spring, you would have thought they would have had a ton of episodes brimming with good ideas coming into this new season. Instead, the show seemingly became even lazier, not even trying to cobble coherent plots together. If the pop culture references worked, then the show remains amusing, otherwise it's just a muddled mess. The standout episode of the season had to be the Surfin Bird episode, which I go back and forth on as to whether it was the funniest thing ever or the most annoying half hour of television ever made.
American Dad: It seems apparent that either Seth McFarlane has put most of his focus on this show or has much more capable running this one than Family Guy because it continues to be a much better show with intelligent humor and clever plotlines. Consider this had the stigma of being the bastard son of Family Guy for so long, it's funny to see how it has surpassed it in quality now. The biggest problem area for this show is Roger, who is great in small doses but grating when he takes over the show. It will be interesting to see how this show's quality is affecting once Seth's third show, The Cleveland Show makes it's debut next year.
Tuesday, December 30, 2008
Midseason TV report (Thursdays)
I was thinking this would wrap up my TV reviews, but then I realized I watch quite a few shows on Sundays as well, so I'll do a post for them in the next few days. By the way, don't think I forgot about Wednesdays; I didn't, there's just nothing decent on that night.
My Name is Earl: I'm beginning to consider giving up on this show. It's not that the show is bad, but compared to so many other sharp, intelligent sitcoms out there, this sticks out like a sore thumb. Each episode makes you feel nice with their uplifting themes, but I just don't find myself laughing a whole lot. All of the main characters have become stale and whenever they try to give the characters new developments, it never is for the better. The highlight of the show is still Jaime Pressley's Joy, who continues to find new levels of being hilariously trashy. If the networks try and squeeze anything else on this night, this is likely the first to go.
Kath and Kim: I gave the show a look and for some reason have stuck with it. The show really isn't very good or funny, but I can't seem to give it up. Part of it is that I know there is potential there because of the funny cast. The other part is that train wreck mentality where you know what you're watching is horrific, yet you can't look away. Along with Earl, this one needs to shape up quickly if it has any chance of surviving on my DVR.
The Office: This season has definitely been an improvement over the unnecessarily dour season 4, but still has not returned to complete greatness. I think I've resigned to the fact that the show simply cannot live up to the awesomeness that was season 2. That season focused on the nuances of working in a dull office, whereas now, too much focus is on the characters and their relationships. There have certainly been some highlights though, including the development of Michael and Holly's relationship. I hope she can return at some point down the line. I also have enjoyed how they've thrown these potential stumbling blocks in front of Jim and Pam, yet have resisted to have them breakup over some cliched conflict. I'll be looking forward to seeing what they do with the post-Super Bowl slot in a few weeks. The early reports sound like we'll be in for a big treat.
30 Rock: I think the praise and accolades have hurt this show a bit. Not that I think the writers or stars are getting big egos, but rather it has caused them to try and create episodes that abandon the show's original concept in order to generate more viewers to justify in remaining on the air. There were too many episodes thus far stuffed with guest stars and there was hardly any time spent on the TV show that the characters work on. The highlight for me this season was the subplot involving Kenneth and Tracy trying to film an appropriate ending to Night Court. In an episode focused on Jennifer Aniston's appearance, seeing the reunion of Harry Anderson and Markie Post was the real treat for me. This show remains funny, but they need to start remembering what brought them to the dance.
Survivor: This was not one of my favorite seasons. Of course, it would have been tough to top the crazy and exciting Fans vs. Favorites season, but this one came in way under expectations. This is mostly to blame on a lousy cast. Anyone that was remotely interesting was booted early and we were left with a handful of unworthy or egotistical characters. It became difficult to root for anyone near the end, however I was thrilled to see that Bob won as he proved himself out there. Unlike their last visit to Africa, locale wasn't a major issue this time. True, there wasn't a whole lot of water, but they made up for that with the beautiful jungles and wildlife, which I'm sure looked amazing in HD. Having watched every season, I know that some are better than others, so I'll definitely be looking forward to seeing what they have in store for us when they travel to Brazil next season.
CSI: We knew going into this season that Grissom wouldn't be sticking around and as sad as that is, I think the show has done a wonderful job of depicting how this job has broken him down. Most of the cases themselves have been nothing extraordinary, but Grissom's performance has been top notch. I would love to see him actually get some recognition come awards season, something that typically eludes him being on a serial show like this. I really enjoyed the cliffhanger episode that introduced Laurence Fishburne. The Dick and Jane killer was very interesting and Fishburne character already has enough mystery surrounding him to make us curious about him. I may not always get to this show immediately on Thursday nights, but it never fails to entertain me whenever I do get around to watching the episodes.
My Name is Earl: I'm beginning to consider giving up on this show. It's not that the show is bad, but compared to so many other sharp, intelligent sitcoms out there, this sticks out like a sore thumb. Each episode makes you feel nice with their uplifting themes, but I just don't find myself laughing a whole lot. All of the main characters have become stale and whenever they try to give the characters new developments, it never is for the better. The highlight of the show is still Jaime Pressley's Joy, who continues to find new levels of being hilariously trashy. If the networks try and squeeze anything else on this night, this is likely the first to go.
Kath and Kim: I gave the show a look and for some reason have stuck with it. The show really isn't very good or funny, but I can't seem to give it up. Part of it is that I know there is potential there because of the funny cast. The other part is that train wreck mentality where you know what you're watching is horrific, yet you can't look away. Along with Earl, this one needs to shape up quickly if it has any chance of surviving on my DVR.
The Office: This season has definitely been an improvement over the unnecessarily dour season 4, but still has not returned to complete greatness. I think I've resigned to the fact that the show simply cannot live up to the awesomeness that was season 2. That season focused on the nuances of working in a dull office, whereas now, too much focus is on the characters and their relationships. There have certainly been some highlights though, including the development of Michael and Holly's relationship. I hope she can return at some point down the line. I also have enjoyed how they've thrown these potential stumbling blocks in front of Jim and Pam, yet have resisted to have them breakup over some cliched conflict. I'll be looking forward to seeing what they do with the post-Super Bowl slot in a few weeks. The early reports sound like we'll be in for a big treat.
30 Rock: I think the praise and accolades have hurt this show a bit. Not that I think the writers or stars are getting big egos, but rather it has caused them to try and create episodes that abandon the show's original concept in order to generate more viewers to justify in remaining on the air. There were too many episodes thus far stuffed with guest stars and there was hardly any time spent on the TV show that the characters work on. The highlight for me this season was the subplot involving Kenneth and Tracy trying to film an appropriate ending to Night Court. In an episode focused on Jennifer Aniston's appearance, seeing the reunion of Harry Anderson and Markie Post was the real treat for me. This show remains funny, but they need to start remembering what brought them to the dance.
Survivor: This was not one of my favorite seasons. Of course, it would have been tough to top the crazy and exciting Fans vs. Favorites season, but this one came in way under expectations. This is mostly to blame on a lousy cast. Anyone that was remotely interesting was booted early and we were left with a handful of unworthy or egotistical characters. It became difficult to root for anyone near the end, however I was thrilled to see that Bob won as he proved himself out there. Unlike their last visit to Africa, locale wasn't a major issue this time. True, there wasn't a whole lot of water, but they made up for that with the beautiful jungles and wildlife, which I'm sure looked amazing in HD. Having watched every season, I know that some are better than others, so I'll definitely be looking forward to seeing what they have in store for us when they travel to Brazil next season.
CSI: We knew going into this season that Grissom wouldn't be sticking around and as sad as that is, I think the show has done a wonderful job of depicting how this job has broken him down. Most of the cases themselves have been nothing extraordinary, but Grissom's performance has been top notch. I would love to see him actually get some recognition come awards season, something that typically eludes him being on a serial show like this. I really enjoyed the cliffhanger episode that introduced Laurence Fishburne. The Dick and Jane killer was very interesting and Fishburne character already has enough mystery surrounding him to make us curious about him. I may not always get to this show immediately on Thursday nights, but it never fails to entertain me whenever I do get around to watching the episodes.
Saturday, December 27, 2008
Man-datory viewing?
I Love You, Man has a stellar cast and the trailer seems funny, but opening in March makes me worry this may not be as good as it seems. Still, check it out and see if you can tell whether this will be a winner or not.
Friday, December 26, 2008
Midseason TV report (Tuesday)
House: While the show still doesn't feel the same with these new doctors, things are slowly improving. I'm at least to the point where I accept them as House's new team, even if I still don't like them as much as the original trio. When the episodes are straightforward cases, things are fine. What I don't like is when the episodes try and delve into these new doctors' personal lives. I liked the House/Wilson 'breakup' that began the season, but felt they could have done more with it. And as for the ongoing issue of Cuddy wanting a baby; how she finally got one was done in a too far-fetched and unrealistic manner. Ultimately the show remains about everyone's favorite cranky doc, and he remains as good as ever, which keeps me turning in every week.
Fringe: This is the only new show that I've watched, so it may not seem like much to say it's the best new show this season, but I am truly enjoying this show. It has a great combination of science fiction, cop drama, and comedy. I love all of the inventive fringe sciences that are explored each week on the show, like the episode where a group of bank robbers had figured out a way using sound waves to walk through walls. The other strength of the show is the cast. Usually it takes a season or two before a cast really gels together, but the actors on this show banter with each other like they've been working with each other for years. Given that J.J. Abrams is behind the show, there is some mythology here, but it's not too deep yet that you couldn't start watching this show now and pick up what's going on. They do a good job of still making each episode as self contained as possible. If you haven't checked out this show, do so when it returns in January.
Fringe: This is the only new show that I've watched, so it may not seem like much to say it's the best new show this season, but I am truly enjoying this show. It has a great combination of science fiction, cop drama, and comedy. I love all of the inventive fringe sciences that are explored each week on the show, like the episode where a group of bank robbers had figured out a way using sound waves to walk through walls. The other strength of the show is the cast. Usually it takes a season or two before a cast really gels together, but the actors on this show banter with each other like they've been working with each other for years. Given that J.J. Abrams is behind the show, there is some mythology here, but it's not too deep yet that you couldn't start watching this show now and pick up what's going on. They do a good job of still making each episode as self contained as possible. If you haven't checked out this show, do so when it returns in January.
Thursday, December 18, 2008
Adamantium pandemonium
Here's the first full trailer for next summer's Wolverine prequel...
After seeing it, I've only have one thing to say: Gambit!!!
After seeing it, I've only have one thing to say: Gambit!!!
Midseason TV report (Mondays)
I've been neglectful in my commentary on my favorite TV shows this fall, so I've decided this week to give a summation of my feelings on these programs now that most of them are on break over the holidays.
The Big Bang Theory - This is quickly becoming one of my favorite sitcoms, which I know isn't saying much given the crop of comedies out there, but this show truly has become something special. To think that a year ago, I wasn't even watching it; I regret waiting so long to come on board. The writers have done a wonderful job fleshing out these characters. They're real people who still remain funny as well. And while the regular cast is great, I'd just like to add how much I enjoyed Sara Rue's recent arc as Leonard new girlfriend. I hope they intend to bring her back again as she's been a nice addition to the cast. My only concern is that the show doesn't turn into The Sheldon Show. He's had a lot of exposure thus far this season, which has been fine. But if the writers aren't careful, it could get out of hand. Still, this show consistently produces the laughs and is a great way to start the night.
How I Met Your Mother - The season has been a bit uneven so far. When it's on, it's as good as any other sitcom out there right now. But sometimes it flounders into sitcom cliches and cheap laughs, which is disappointing. I think the most frustrating thing is that most of the characters have been stuck in neutral for most of the season. I truly think the producers never thought the show would last this long. It's becoming particularly cruel to the fans to keep making us become invested in Ted's love interests only to learn they aren't the mother. They'll get to a point where they'll reveal the mother and the person won't be able to stack up against the previous contenders. On the plus side of things, I've liked how we've gotten to know more about Robin. Whenever they deal with her Canadian roots, it's comedy gold. Finally, I'm disappointed we've gone so long without Barney being slapped by Marshall. There have been a couple of great opportunities to do it that have already gone by. Let's hope the writers haven't forgotten about this plot detail.
Chuck - No sophomore jinx here as this show continues to be a fun romp. You can't really provide the show with a lot of superlatives, but the show is able to consistently entertain me, while naturally progressing their stories. I like how we're moving forward with the Fulcrum story and how they're getting closer to realizing Chuck is the intersect. I also think that the Chuck and Sarah relationship is progressing at the level it should. A lot of the fun of this show though comes from the surrounding cast of characters. Ellie and Awesome are just great and seeing more of the Buy More staff has been great; although Anna has been somewhat underutilized lately. The show has also had some great guest stars including Tony Hale's annoying Emmitt, Gary Cole as Sarah's con artist dad, and Reginal Veljohnson (Carl Winslow!!) showing up this week to play a cop who's also Big Mike's cousin. It may not be the best show out there, but it rarely disappoints.
Heroes: Oy, where to begin with this one. I could do a whole rant/post just on this show alone, but I'll try to be as succinct as possible. This show was all over the place this year from a narrative perspective and proved that it does not have the same caliber of people working on it than on a show like Lost when it comes to planning and storytelling. Each episode as a whole can be exciting to watch, but when you then look back and try to make sense of everything your head begins to hurt. There are just too many plot holes and continuity errors to ignore. In addition, it seems they can't seem to figure out what their audience wants. Characters that are cool or interesting are quickly killed off, while some of the dumbest characters ever written for television remain on the show 3 years later. Again, not to make comparisons to Lost, but when fans hated Nikki and Paulo, they were killed off and when they enjoyed Desmond and Ben, they found ways to make them a part of the regular cast. The one postive about Heroes is that they have set up their next chapter in a manner that seems like it could be an interesting plotline. Plus Bryan Fuller, one of the intelligent people working on the show back in Season 1, is back and helping to right the ship. The premise of the show remains solid, so if they can begin to figure out how to write compelling, episodic television, they may be able to win some of their fans back.
The Big Bang Theory - This is quickly becoming one of my favorite sitcoms, which I know isn't saying much given the crop of comedies out there, but this show truly has become something special. To think that a year ago, I wasn't even watching it; I regret waiting so long to come on board. The writers have done a wonderful job fleshing out these characters. They're real people who still remain funny as well. And while the regular cast is great, I'd just like to add how much I enjoyed Sara Rue's recent arc as Leonard new girlfriend. I hope they intend to bring her back again as she's been a nice addition to the cast. My only concern is that the show doesn't turn into The Sheldon Show. He's had a lot of exposure thus far this season, which has been fine. But if the writers aren't careful, it could get out of hand. Still, this show consistently produces the laughs and is a great way to start the night.
How I Met Your Mother - The season has been a bit uneven so far. When it's on, it's as good as any other sitcom out there right now. But sometimes it flounders into sitcom cliches and cheap laughs, which is disappointing. I think the most frustrating thing is that most of the characters have been stuck in neutral for most of the season. I truly think the producers never thought the show would last this long. It's becoming particularly cruel to the fans to keep making us become invested in Ted's love interests only to learn they aren't the mother. They'll get to a point where they'll reveal the mother and the person won't be able to stack up against the previous contenders. On the plus side of things, I've liked how we've gotten to know more about Robin. Whenever they deal with her Canadian roots, it's comedy gold. Finally, I'm disappointed we've gone so long without Barney being slapped by Marshall. There have been a couple of great opportunities to do it that have already gone by. Let's hope the writers haven't forgotten about this plot detail.
Chuck - No sophomore jinx here as this show continues to be a fun romp. You can't really provide the show with a lot of superlatives, but the show is able to consistently entertain me, while naturally progressing their stories. I like how we're moving forward with the Fulcrum story and how they're getting closer to realizing Chuck is the intersect. I also think that the Chuck and Sarah relationship is progressing at the level it should. A lot of the fun of this show though comes from the surrounding cast of characters. Ellie and Awesome are just great and seeing more of the Buy More staff has been great; although Anna has been somewhat underutilized lately. The show has also had some great guest stars including Tony Hale's annoying Emmitt, Gary Cole as Sarah's con artist dad, and Reginal Veljohnson (Carl Winslow!!) showing up this week to play a cop who's also Big Mike's cousin. It may not be the best show out there, but it rarely disappoints.
Heroes: Oy, where to begin with this one. I could do a whole rant/post just on this show alone, but I'll try to be as succinct as possible. This show was all over the place this year from a narrative perspective and proved that it does not have the same caliber of people working on it than on a show like Lost when it comes to planning and storytelling. Each episode as a whole can be exciting to watch, but when you then look back and try to make sense of everything your head begins to hurt. There are just too many plot holes and continuity errors to ignore. In addition, it seems they can't seem to figure out what their audience wants. Characters that are cool or interesting are quickly killed off, while some of the dumbest characters ever written for television remain on the show 3 years later. Again, not to make comparisons to Lost, but when fans hated Nikki and Paulo, they were killed off and when they enjoyed Desmond and Ben, they found ways to make them a part of the regular cast. The one postive about Heroes is that they have set up their next chapter in a manner that seems like it could be an interesting plotline. Plus Bryan Fuller, one of the intelligent people working on the show back in Season 1, is back and helping to right the ship. The premise of the show remains solid, so if they can begin to figure out how to write compelling, episodic television, they may be able to win some of their fans back.
Wednesday, December 17, 2008
Price is Right history
What should have been a significant moment, however, was a bit marred. Turns out the guy got his bid from someone in the audience who is a big nerd over at Golden-Road.net who had the prizes' prices memorized. While not illegal, it certainly takes the fun out of it. Apparently, there was a 45 minute tape delay between when the contestants gave their showcase bids and when they revealed the actual retail prices. The delay was for Standards and Practices to make sure their hadn't been any cheating. So the long lag time, plus the knowledge of how he got that price I think diminshed Drew's reaction when he revealed the price. In reality, Drew should have been going crazy over this as I was when I first saw it. It's a shame it turned out that way, but it's still a pretty good moment, nonetheless.
Riding the bullet train
I just saw Wanted through Netflix, but decided to do a full review anyways since it's still a major release from this year and because I gyped everyone out of full reviews for The Rocker and Journey to the Center of the Earth.
This was a film that just never generated much interest from me earlier this year. I'm not sure if it was the generic title, vague plotline, or underwhelming cast, but nothing about this screamed 'must-see summer film'. However, it did moderately well at the box office, so I figured I would see if I was off the mark on this one or if it was another example of the stupidity of America.
Wanted is based off a comic book, but unless you're really a hardcore comic book nerd, you're probably unfamiliar with the story. The plot centers Wesley Gibson (played by James McAvoy), an office drone who is suddenly recruited into a group of assassins called the Fraternity, who tell him that his recently deceased father had been a member of the group. Morgan Freeman plays Sloan, the leader of the fraternity and Angelina Jolie is Fox, the assassin assigned to train Wesley.
Sadly, the acting here isn't of a high caliber. I felt McAvoy was miscast here as he was neither convincing as the downtrodden working for the weekend employee nor as the badass assassin he becomes. McAvoy underplays both roles to the degree that you never get emotionally wrapped up in what he's doing or what's happening to him. Freeman and Jolie are fine, but these are both roles that are so familiar for them, they could play them in their sleep. In the end, nobody's performance in the film feels very inspired.
Some inspiration and creativity could also have been needed for the film's story. Every plot point from the movie feels like a retread from other better action films. You pretty much know where the story is going from the beginning. About the only unique thing about the film from a story perspective is the Fraternity's magic loom, which informs the assassins of their next target. However, as you can probably tell just from reading that sentence, that plot point is more silly than creative.
It appears that all of the creativity needed in the story was instead invested in the action sequences. This is an adrenaline-fueled film that provides several action scenes not found in most films of the genre. Even without the luxury of a big screen or high-definition, I was impressed by the visual style of the film and the way in which the stunts were depicted. Sure, most of the action defies the laws of gravity and plausibility, but sometimes that is ok. It's nice to have that escape from reality and just be amazed by the inventiveness of the scenes unfolding before your eyes.
Now there have certainly been some other films recently that have just tried to go all out with their action and violence, but this one does it more successfully I feel. Unlike a film like Shoot 'Em Up, where the violence just seemed so senseless and depressing, Wanted succeeds at turning their action scenes into an art form. I feel most will be like me and marvel at the lengths these Fraternity members go in order to complete the kill.
I'm going to go ahead and give this one a mild recommendation. I think you have to be in the right frame of mind to enjoy it, but if you are, you should have a lot of fun watching the gun play and car chase scenes. This may not have the most original story, but unlike so many other films that suffer from a lack of creativity, I wasn't bothered by it. The film is like a 4th of July fireworks display; sure, they may not offer anything new each time, but you can't help and watch them every year and appreciate their sheer beauty. And in that sense, I guess that makes it the perfect summer movie. Looks like my first impressions aren't always right. In this case, I'm glad I was wrong. Grade: B-
This was a film that just never generated much interest from me earlier this year. I'm not sure if it was the generic title, vague plotline, or underwhelming cast, but nothing about this screamed 'must-see summer film'. However, it did moderately well at the box office, so I figured I would see if I was off the mark on this one or if it was another example of the stupidity of America.
Wanted is based off a comic book, but unless you're really a hardcore comic book nerd, you're probably unfamiliar with the story. The plot centers Wesley Gibson (played by James McAvoy), an office drone who is suddenly recruited into a group of assassins called the Fraternity, who tell him that his recently deceased father had been a member of the group. Morgan Freeman plays Sloan, the leader of the fraternity and Angelina Jolie is Fox, the assassin assigned to train Wesley.
Sadly, the acting here isn't of a high caliber. I felt McAvoy was miscast here as he was neither convincing as the downtrodden working for the weekend employee nor as the badass assassin he becomes. McAvoy underplays both roles to the degree that you never get emotionally wrapped up in what he's doing or what's happening to him. Freeman and Jolie are fine, but these are both roles that are so familiar for them, they could play them in their sleep. In the end, nobody's performance in the film feels very inspired.
Some inspiration and creativity could also have been needed for the film's story. Every plot point from the movie feels like a retread from other better action films. You pretty much know where the story is going from the beginning. About the only unique thing about the film from a story perspective is the Fraternity's magic loom, which informs the assassins of their next target. However, as you can probably tell just from reading that sentence, that plot point is more silly than creative.
It appears that all of the creativity needed in the story was instead invested in the action sequences. This is an adrenaline-fueled film that provides several action scenes not found in most films of the genre. Even without the luxury of a big screen or high-definition, I was impressed by the visual style of the film and the way in which the stunts were depicted. Sure, most of the action defies the laws of gravity and plausibility, but sometimes that is ok. It's nice to have that escape from reality and just be amazed by the inventiveness of the scenes unfolding before your eyes.
Now there have certainly been some other films recently that have just tried to go all out with their action and violence, but this one does it more successfully I feel. Unlike a film like Shoot 'Em Up, where the violence just seemed so senseless and depressing, Wanted succeeds at turning their action scenes into an art form. I feel most will be like me and marvel at the lengths these Fraternity members go in order to complete the kill.
I'm going to go ahead and give this one a mild recommendation. I think you have to be in the right frame of mind to enjoy it, but if you are, you should have a lot of fun watching the gun play and car chase scenes. This may not have the most original story, but unlike so many other films that suffer from a lack of creativity, I wasn't bothered by it. The film is like a 4th of July fireworks display; sure, they may not offer anything new each time, but you can't help and watch them every year and appreciate their sheer beauty. And in that sense, I guess that makes it the perfect summer movie. Looks like my first impressions aren't always right. In this case, I'm glad I was wrong. Grade: B-
Friday, December 12, 2008
NMR: Triple threat
Managed to get in a few Netflix movies over the past few weeks...
Confidence: This was a film with a decent cast that somehow received little attention a few years back. This is your typical con movie. They tell you right up front that they're con men, so you know that whatever is happening in the movie is all part of a con too. From that perspective, the film is a disappointment because you feel like you're always two steps ahead of it when it should be the other way around. However, the acting is solid here, especially Dustin Hoffman playing a sleazy mob boss. If you enjoy these types of films, give it a rent; otherwise, there's nothing special here. Rating: ***
Jackass 2.5: I was looking for something short that I could watch through Netflix online and this fit the bill. This consists of a series of stunts that the guys couldn't fit into Jackass Number Two. While a couple of the bits are typical Jackass fun, like Human Golf Tee, it's clear why most of the stuff didn't make the cut. If you're a true Jackass fan, you've probably seen this already and if you're not, then there really isn't any reason for you to watch this. Rating: ***
Bad News Bears: This is the 2006 remake starring Billy Bob Thorton. This has a handful of decent laughs, but this is a surprising faithful remake to the original, which leaves it devoid of many surprises. I'm not sure who this is meant for, which was proven by the fact that not a lot of people saw in the theaters. If it's on TV, it's entertaining enough to keep on. But there's no real reason to seek it out, especially if you've already seen the original film. Rating: ***
Confidence: This was a film with a decent cast that somehow received little attention a few years back. This is your typical con movie. They tell you right up front that they're con men, so you know that whatever is happening in the movie is all part of a con too. From that perspective, the film is a disappointment because you feel like you're always two steps ahead of it when it should be the other way around. However, the acting is solid here, especially Dustin Hoffman playing a sleazy mob boss. If you enjoy these types of films, give it a rent; otherwise, there's nothing special here. Rating: ***
Jackass 2.5: I was looking for something short that I could watch through Netflix online and this fit the bill. This consists of a series of stunts that the guys couldn't fit into Jackass Number Two. While a couple of the bits are typical Jackass fun, like Human Golf Tee, it's clear why most of the stuff didn't make the cut. If you're a true Jackass fan, you've probably seen this already and if you're not, then there really isn't any reason for you to watch this. Rating: ***
Bad News Bears: This is the 2006 remake starring Billy Bob Thorton. This has a handful of decent laughs, but this is a surprising faithful remake to the original, which leaves it devoid of many surprises. I'm not sure who this is meant for, which was proven by the fact that not a lot of people saw in the theaters. If it's on TV, it's entertaining enough to keep on. But there's no real reason to seek it out, especially if you've already seen the original film. Rating: ***
Thursday, December 11, 2008
Wanna see my Golden Globes?
Golden Globe nominations came out today as the awards season is now in full swing. While there were no major surprises, it's hard to read much into the Globes since they do the goofy split of films into drama and comedy categories.
The nominees for Best Drama were: The Curious Case of Benjamin Button, Frost/Nixon, The Reader, Revolutionary Road, and Slumdog Millionaire
The nominees for Best Comedy/Musical were: Burn After Reading, Happy-Go-Lucky, In Bruges, Mamma Mia!, and Vicky Christina Barcelona
An eccelectic mix if ever there was one. I still think this is a wide open race right now, but at least we're beginning to see who the familiar faces are going to be when it comes time for the Oscars.
To see the full list of nominees, go here: 2008 Golden Globe Nominees
The nominees for Best Drama were: The Curious Case of Benjamin Button, Frost/Nixon, The Reader, Revolutionary Road, and Slumdog Millionaire
The nominees for Best Comedy/Musical were: Burn After Reading, Happy-Go-Lucky, In Bruges, Mamma Mia!, and Vicky Christina Barcelona
An eccelectic mix if ever there was one. I still think this is a wide open race right now, but at least we're beginning to see who the familiar faces are going to be when it comes time for the Oscars.
To see the full list of nominees, go here: 2008 Golden Globe Nominees
Terminator Salvation trailer
I'm not sure what to make of this one yet. I've never been a big fan of the Terminator franchise, but adding Christian Bale as John Connor instant improves the credibility of this film. I'll probably see this, but I doubt this will be an opening weekend viewing for me. What do you think?
Wednesday, December 10, 2008
Cleveland sports roundup
I haven't talked much about Cleveland sports lately since things have been so dreary, but there's finally some good news to share.
Wood expected to sign two-year deal with Tribe
So it looks like the Indians have got themselves a closer for next year. I'm cautiously optimistic about this deal. Wood was great as a closer for the Cubs last season, but has been known to have injury problems. If he can stay healthy, I think this is a very good move for the Tribe and helps bolster the back end of that bullpen.
Sabathia to accept Yankees' offer
I know this isn't really Indians' news, but I wanted to talk about it anyways. I am really disappointed to hear this. Not just for the fact that the Yanks got a really good pitcher, but because it seems like this was a move done out of greed. C.C. has talked about nothing but playing back in his home state of California and in the National League so he can bat. Last I checked, New York doesn't meet either of those criteria. I know the economy is tough, but for C.C. to forego his dream for big money is disappointing. And it sickens me to see so many people struggling financially, yet Steinbrenner can give out $160 million like it's nothing. Ugh.
Browns eye Schottenheimer for 2009
Speaking of disappointing, the Browns certainly have had a disappointing season. And as a result there is a lot of talk of Romeo Crennel getting fired at the end of the year. While I can understand that move, I don't necessarily think Romeo deserves to get fired. If anyone deserves to go, it's GM Phil Savage. But if Romeo does go, I'm very interested by this news of Marty ball possibly returning to Cleveland. I think he got the shaft out in San Diego and could possibly provide the spark that this team needs. I know a lot of the new, inexperienced coaches have done well in the NFL this year, but I think Schottenheimer is a proven commodity that could take the talent that is on this team and turn them back into winners. But again, this is all speculative at this point, so let's not get ahead of ourselves.
Finally, I just want to applaud that Cleveland Cavs for their fine start to this NBA season. I typically don't cover the Cavs because I am not a big fan of pro basketball, but you have to be impressed with this 9 game winning streak where they are just crushing their opponents. I'll enjoy it now, but we need them to play like this in the playoffs before I'm truly convinced. Let's face it, if we have even the slightest chance of keeping Lebron, it's going to take us being a championship-caliber franchise. For now, let's just hope they keep this up.
Wood expected to sign two-year deal with Tribe
So it looks like the Indians have got themselves a closer for next year. I'm cautiously optimistic about this deal. Wood was great as a closer for the Cubs last season, but has been known to have injury problems. If he can stay healthy, I think this is a very good move for the Tribe and helps bolster the back end of that bullpen.
Sabathia to accept Yankees' offer
I know this isn't really Indians' news, but I wanted to talk about it anyways. I am really disappointed to hear this. Not just for the fact that the Yanks got a really good pitcher, but because it seems like this was a move done out of greed. C.C. has talked about nothing but playing back in his home state of California and in the National League so he can bat. Last I checked, New York doesn't meet either of those criteria. I know the economy is tough, but for C.C. to forego his dream for big money is disappointing. And it sickens me to see so many people struggling financially, yet Steinbrenner can give out $160 million like it's nothing. Ugh.
Browns eye Schottenheimer for 2009
Speaking of disappointing, the Browns certainly have had a disappointing season. And as a result there is a lot of talk of Romeo Crennel getting fired at the end of the year. While I can understand that move, I don't necessarily think Romeo deserves to get fired. If anyone deserves to go, it's GM Phil Savage. But if Romeo does go, I'm very interested by this news of Marty ball possibly returning to Cleveland. I think he got the shaft out in San Diego and could possibly provide the spark that this team needs. I know a lot of the new, inexperienced coaches have done well in the NFL this year, but I think Schottenheimer is a proven commodity that could take the talent that is on this team and turn them back into winners. But again, this is all speculative at this point, so let's not get ahead of ourselves.
Finally, I just want to applaud that Cleveland Cavs for their fine start to this NBA season. I typically don't cover the Cavs because I am not a big fan of pro basketball, but you have to be impressed with this 9 game winning streak where they are just crushing their opponents. I'll enjoy it now, but we need them to play like this in the playoffs before I'm truly convinced. Let's face it, if we have even the slightest chance of keeping Lebron, it's going to take us being a championship-caliber franchise. For now, let's just hope they keep this up.
Heroes' saving hero?
I reported a couple weeks ago about Pushing Daises' Bryan Fuller returning to Heroes later on this season. For those unsure about the move or curious as to what impact he'll have, here's an interview he conducted with EW, which reveals his analysis of Heroes' season thus far and what changes they're looking at making.
Exclusive interview with Bryan Fuller
Reading his comments, makes me very hopeful that they still have a chance to right this ship and bring the show back to the promised land.
Exclusive interview with Bryan Fuller
Reading his comments, makes me very hopeful that they still have a chance to right this ship and bring the show back to the promised land.
Saturday, December 6, 2008
Thursday, December 4, 2008
Gentlemen, start your projectors
The Oscar race is officially underway as the first major awards were handed out last night. The National Board of Review announced winners in several categories. In addition to the individual winners, they also list a top ten, which for some reason, doesn't include their winner for best film; so I guess you can consider it a top eleven list. Anyways, the winners are listed below. From the looks of things, this year is going to be very wide open.
Best Film: Slumdog Millionaire
Best Director: David Fincher, The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
Best Actor: Clint Eastwood, Gran Torino
Best Actress: Anne Hathaway, Rachel Getting Married
Best Supporting Actor: Josh Brolin, Milk
Best Supporting Actress: Penélope Cruz, Vicky Cristina Barcelona
Best Foreign Language Film: Mongol
Best Documentary: Man on Wire
Best Animated Feature: Wall-E
Best Ensemble Cast: Doubt
Breakthrough Performance by an Actor: Dev Patel, Slumdog Millionaire
Breakthrough Performance by an Actress: Viola Davis, Doubt
Best Directorial Debut: Courtney Hunt, Frozen River
Best Original Screenplay: Nick Schenk, Gran Torino
Best Adapted Screenplay: Simon Beaufoy, Slumdog Millionaire and Eric Roth, The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
Spotlight Award: Melissa Leo, Frozen River and Richard Jenkins, The Visitor
The BVLGARI Award for NBR Freedom of Expression: Trumbo
Top Ten Films:
Burn After Reading
Changeling
The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
The Dark Knight
Defiance
Frost/Nixon
Gran Torino
Milk
Wall-E
The Wrestler
Best Film: Slumdog Millionaire
Best Director: David Fincher, The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
Best Actor: Clint Eastwood, Gran Torino
Best Actress: Anne Hathaway, Rachel Getting Married
Best Supporting Actor: Josh Brolin, Milk
Best Supporting Actress: Penélope Cruz, Vicky Cristina Barcelona
Best Foreign Language Film: Mongol
Best Documentary: Man on Wire
Best Animated Feature: Wall-E
Best Ensemble Cast: Doubt
Breakthrough Performance by an Actor: Dev Patel, Slumdog Millionaire
Breakthrough Performance by an Actress: Viola Davis, Doubt
Best Directorial Debut: Courtney Hunt, Frozen River
Best Original Screenplay: Nick Schenk, Gran Torino
Best Adapted Screenplay: Simon Beaufoy, Slumdog Millionaire and Eric Roth, The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
Spotlight Award: Melissa Leo, Frozen River and Richard Jenkins, The Visitor
The BVLGARI Award for NBR Freedom of Expression: Trumbo
Top Ten Films:
Burn After Reading
Changeling
The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
The Dark Knight
Defiance
Frost/Nixon
Gran Torino
Milk
Wall-E
The Wrestler
Don't adjust your set!
So this week on Price is Right, it's been the infamous "purple wheel" episodes. Apparently, they accidentally painted it purple while the show was on a taping break. They had a week's worth of episodes with this funky wheel before painting it back. When I heard about it, I thought it would look terrible, but it's not that bad. I'm still glad they decided to change it back though. Check it out for yourself below.
As Daisies wilts, Heroes creative staff gets Fuller
From comingsoon.net:
This is definitely good news. I never watched Daisies, so I'm not really mourning over its cancellation. And Fuller definitely is a creative mind and his return can only help the struggling Heroes. Suddenly, I have a reason to continue watching the show.
"Pushing Daisies" creator/executive producer Bryan Fuller is close to a two-year overall deal with Universal Media Studios, says The Hollywood Reporter.
Fuller will rejoin the UMS-produced drama "Heroes," which he left after the first season to launch ABC/WBTV's "Daisies," and will develop new projects for the studio.
Fuller, who is wrapping post-production on the final episodes of "Daisies'" 13-episode second-season order, is expected to officially come on board "Heroes" starting with Episode 20.
His exact role on the sci-fi drama has not been determined, but he is expected to play a key role in the writers room alongside "Heroes" creator/executive producer/showrunner Tim Kring.
This is definitely good news. I never watched Daisies, so I'm not really mourning over its cancellation. And Fuller definitely is a creative mind and his return can only help the struggling Heroes. Suddenly, I have a reason to continue watching the show.
Tuesday, December 2, 2008
Summer leftovers
I've been away from the blog too long, so I'm going to try and make up for that with a post explosion today. First up is a pair of short movie reviews for a couple of movies I saw recently.
The Rocker: I actually saw this as part of my 5 movies in 5 days stunt a few weeks ago, but I just never got around to posting a review for it. Now with so much time passed, it will only get a mini-review. This is an amiable film that really doesn't break any new ground. Rainn Wilson does a nice job as Robert 'Fish' Fishman, a hair metal band drummer who gets kicked out of his band right before they hit it big. Now he's middle-aged and still trying to rock out, this time with his nephew's high school band. This one has neither the sweetness nor the rock appreciation that a film like School of Rock had, nor the edgy comedy of the Apatow films. You can see how everything will play out, but you don't mind since the story works. Although I will admit that the comeuppance that Fish's old band receives at the end of the movie doesn't seem plausible or realistic. I think the best part of the film for me is that a lot of it takes place in Cleveland and they show several scenes involving the city landscape. I wish I could have been at the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame when Rainn was filming his scenes there. This one probably isn't worth actively renting, but when its eventually on cable and its a rainy Saturday afternoon, you may want to give it a look. Grade: C+
Journey to the Center of the Earth: This one I caught as I was flying back from San Diego. If you're unfamiliar, it's the modern update of the classic Jules Verne story; this time with Brenden Fraser, his nephew, and a cute tour guide somehow finding their to the center of the Earth and then trying to find a way to come back home. Again, this film is not terrible, but not great either. Then again, I probably didn't get the full experience of the film. This film is clearly designed to be seen in 3-D. Not only did I not see it in 3-D, but I didn't even see it on a regular size screen. A lot gets lost on that tiny airplane screen. And watching a film meant for 3-D on anything but, can be really annoying. Especially when they do things like spit or throw something at the camera that you can tell was meant to utilize the technology but just looks dumb if you watch it in 2-D. Fraser is good in these visual-laden adventure films, but the other two actors don't provide a whole lot. Kids will probably really enjoy this, but I thought they didn't do enough to fully explore the landscape of the mythical center of the Earth. I'm glad the film did well though since they went out of their way to set up a sequel at the end of this film. I think with the 3-D format becoming so popular lately, that film will almost certainly get made. If you didn't see this one yet, try and find a way to see it in 3-D; otherwise you can probably skip it. Grade: C
The Rocker: I actually saw this as part of my 5 movies in 5 days stunt a few weeks ago, but I just never got around to posting a review for it. Now with so much time passed, it will only get a mini-review. This is an amiable film that really doesn't break any new ground. Rainn Wilson does a nice job as Robert 'Fish' Fishman, a hair metal band drummer who gets kicked out of his band right before they hit it big. Now he's middle-aged and still trying to rock out, this time with his nephew's high school band. This one has neither the sweetness nor the rock appreciation that a film like School of Rock had, nor the edgy comedy of the Apatow films. You can see how everything will play out, but you don't mind since the story works. Although I will admit that the comeuppance that Fish's old band receives at the end of the movie doesn't seem plausible or realistic. I think the best part of the film for me is that a lot of it takes place in Cleveland and they show several scenes involving the city landscape. I wish I could have been at the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame when Rainn was filming his scenes there. This one probably isn't worth actively renting, but when its eventually on cable and its a rainy Saturday afternoon, you may want to give it a look. Grade: C+
Journey to the Center of the Earth: This one I caught as I was flying back from San Diego. If you're unfamiliar, it's the modern update of the classic Jules Verne story; this time with Brenden Fraser, his nephew, and a cute tour guide somehow finding their to the center of the Earth and then trying to find a way to come back home. Again, this film is not terrible, but not great either. Then again, I probably didn't get the full experience of the film. This film is clearly designed to be seen in 3-D. Not only did I not see it in 3-D, but I didn't even see it on a regular size screen. A lot gets lost on that tiny airplane screen. And watching a film meant for 3-D on anything but, can be really annoying. Especially when they do things like spit or throw something at the camera that you can tell was meant to utilize the technology but just looks dumb if you watch it in 2-D. Fraser is good in these visual-laden adventure films, but the other two actors don't provide a whole lot. Kids will probably really enjoy this, but I thought they didn't do enough to fully explore the landscape of the mythical center of the Earth. I'm glad the film did well though since they went out of their way to set up a sequel at the end of this film. I think with the 3-D format becoming so popular lately, that film will almost certainly get made. If you didn't see this one yet, try and find a way to see it in 3-D; otherwise you can probably skip it. Grade: C
Thursday, November 27, 2008
Friday, November 14, 2008
Quantum of Solace (2008) - WARNING! Major spoilers ahead
Plot: Daniel Craig reprises his role as Ian Fleming's James Bond in Quantum of Solace, the 22nd feature in the 007 film franchise. Fueled by the betrayal of Vesper, the woman he loved, Bond's determination to track down the mastermind behind the sinister organization that blackmailed her takes him to Haiti, where he finds an unlikely ally in the beautiful and feisty Camille (Olga Kurylenko). The trail quickly leads to the ruthless Dominic Greene (Mathieu Amalric), but with the British Government and the CIA working against him, Bond must kill or be killed on his mission to uncover the truth.
Firsts: Direct sequel of a previous Bond film, gunbarrel sequence appears at the end of the movie
Gadgets: None besides the fancy wall and table computers used in the MI6 offices
Girls Bond slept with: Agent Fields
Elaborate murder attempt that Bond escapes: There's plenty of attempts to kill him, but all are pretty straight-forward
Personal review: After all the hype, would you expect anything less than for me to have seen this at the midnight showing last night? So what's the verdict? Well, if I had to sum it up it's not a great Bond film, but a necessary one. There is plenty to enjoy here, for sure, but it is also a significant step down from the amazing Casino Royale. I have a feeling you'll be seeing me use the word 'but' a lot in this review because there are so many aspects of the film that left me divided.
Let's begin with a few Bond mainstays that I wanted to see in this film that were missing from Royale: 1) Q, 2) Moneypenny, 3) the traditional gunbarrel sequence. Well there was no Q or Moneypenny, but that was ok. The Bond producers have said they will return when it fits the story. And since this was a continuation of Royale, I perfectly understand why they aren't here, but I would like them back at some point. As for the gunbarrel sequence, yes it's here in its traditional form but they put it at the end of film. WHY?!? Director Marc Forster said he wanted it as a surprise, but I thought that was a dumb move. You're going to have traditional Bond fans, like myself, upset throughout the beginning of the film thinking that they got rid of it altogether. I'm glad it wasn't scrapped, but putting it at the end didn't make sense to me at all. Hopefully that gets changed next time out.
It appears from some of the stuff that I've read that Marc Forster was responsible for a lot of the changes that I did not care for in the film. I don't know if it was really him, but if it was, I hope he does not get asked back to direct another Bond film. Another example is with the credit sequence. Instead of sticking with Daniel Kleinman, who's done the past five Bond films, they go with a production crew that has worked with Forster on his previous films. I liked the concept that they went with in the credit sequence, but something just felt off about it.
The action sequences are another area of the film that I did not care for Forster's approach on. The actual action that was going on was very cool. Some excellent concepts in both hand-to-hand fights and vehicular chase sequences. However, Forster felt the need to shoot everything so close up and intimate that you lost a lot of the time, what was actually going on. He tried mimicking Paul Greengrass' style used in the Bourne flicks, but I just didn't care for it here. I know a lot of people cheered Royale for making the Bond franchise more like the Bourne films, but I don't want a carbon copy. Let Bourne be Bourne and Bond be Bond.
Of course, the one constant that remains solid here is Craig. I continue to love the approach he is taking with the character. I've read a lot of critics who feel the character is too angry and unapproachable, but I didn't get that. Sure, the film centers around his revenge mission, but I felt there to be plenty of glimpses of his lighter side and there were several moments throughout the film that garnered laughs from the crowd. So the whole criticism of the film being too somber doesn't fly with me.
I also really loved the locales that they chose for the film. I thought they once again did a great job of picking out events and locations that seemed new in a Bond films and added something to the action around them. I particularly loved the Tosca scenes, both for exhibiting the beautiful performance and for showcasing Bond being an awesome prick to the bad guys. However, I do wish they could have made the locales a bit more varying. The film had a consistent brown, black, white motif, which looked dirty and got monotonous. I also didn't care for the cutesy title cards indicating the new location. They seemed out of place and unnecessary, especially when they just said in the previous scene where they were going.
As for the rest of the cast, I enjoyed them but I thought they were all underutilized. Mathieu Amalric is decent, but doesn't get to truly exhibit pure evil. I also found it odd as to how hands-on he was in his evil plans considering how supposedly secret his organization was (a point stressed early on in the film). I also enjoyed both Bond girl and thought both were absolutely gorgeous. They also had some interesting characteristics about them, that weren't fully explored. I loved the Goldfinger homage involving Agent Fields though. But for Bond not to have slept with Camille at any point in the film just seemed wrong on many levels.
Finally, I thought the film really could have used to expanded its ending. There are two seperate scenes were Bond confronts a key villain, yet we do not get to see the conversations between them. Instead, we just see the aftermath. Given how much time we've spent over these two films on the betrayal of Vesper and the organization behind it, I really thought it was a ripoff not to see Bond interact with these characters more and let us hear the information that we want to know. The film is under two hours, a rariety for Bond films, so there was no reason why those scenes shouldn't have been included.
Overall, in a vaccuum, the film is a very entertaining action movie. For Bond fans, there is no doubt going to be some disappointment. As I said at the beginning, while this may not have been a great film, it was a necessary one. It has closed the chapter on Vesper and I think now they are ready to have Bond truly be Bond again. There have been some interviews already indicating this, so I'm anxious to see if they are good on their word. Definitely see this movie, just don't expect the same quality that you got with Casino Royale. 8.5/10
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)