2012 Movie Preview (#30 - 25)

Hard to believe we're at the end of another year. While there were plenty of things to celebrate in 2011, I feel that it was a rather lackluster year at the cineplex. Granted I haven't seen a number of potentially good movies yet, but overall I just wasn't as enamored with most of Hollywood's offerings this past year. But hope springs eternal, so as we turn the calendar over to 2012 we look ahead and I think things are looking much brighter. In the next few days, I'll be previewing the 30 films set to come out next year that I'm most looking forward to. Keep checking in throughout this week and see if you agree that 2012 is shaping up to be a great year at the movies.

30. Wreck-It Ralph (November 2nd)

Plot: Wreck-It Ralph (voice of John C. Reilly) longs to be as beloved as his game's perfect Good Guy, Fix-It Felix (voice of Jack McBrayer). Problem is, nobody loves a Bad Guy. But they do love heroes... so when a modern, first-person shooter game arrives featuring tough-as-nails Sergeant Calhoun (voice of Jane Lynch), Ralph sees it as his ticket to heroism and happiness. He sneaks into the game with a simple plan-win a medal-but soon wrecks everything, and accidently unleashes a deadly enemy that threatens every game in the arcade. Ralph's only hope? Vanellope von Schweetz (voice of Sarah Silverman), a young troublemaking "glitch" from a candy-coated cart racing game who might just be the one to teach Ralph what it means to be a Good Guy. But will he realize he is good enough to become a hero before it's "Game Over" for the entire arcade?

Personal opinion: As will be the theme for most of these early movies on this list, it's a little too early to tell how this one will turn out. It has a terrific voice cast and it's being produced by Disney (although this is not a Pixar animated film) so it has the credentials, but I'm a little unsure of the film's story. It feels like well-tred territory. We recently had both Despicable Me and Megamind do the whole 'bad guy gone good' plot and there also seems to be some similarities to this film and the 90s cartoon Reboot. If the film can feel fresh, this should be very successful.


29. Man on a Ledge (January 27th)

Plot: An ex-cop and now wanted fugitive (Sam Worthington) stands on the ledge of a high-rise building while a hard-living New York Police Department hostage negotiator (Elizabeth Banks) tries to talk him down. The longer they are on the ledge, the more she realizes that he might have an ulterior objective.

Personal opinion: If you didn't see it originally, I had posted the trailer for this film a few weeks ago. I doubt this movie will set the world on fire, but given that January is usually a dumping ground for lousy movies, this looks like it has a chance at being half-way decent. There are a lot of solid character actors here who will no doubt raise the film's quality. And based on the trailer, there looks like there could be several twists and turns in the story. As long as they don't get too cute with the storytelling this could be worthy of making a trip out to the theater during the dead of winter.


28. Gravity (November 21st)

Plot: Dr. Ryan Stone (Sandra Bullock) is a brilliant medical engineer on her first shuttle mission, with veteran astronaut Matt Kowalsky (George Clooney) in command of his last flight before retiring. But on a seemingly routine spacewalk, disaster strikes. The shuttle is destroyed, leaving Stone and Kowalsky completely alone--tethered to nothing but each other and spiraling out into the blackness. The deafening silence tells them they have lost any link to Earth...and any chance for rescue. As fear turns to panic, every gulp of air eats away at what little oxygen is left. But the only way home may be to go further out into the terrifying expanse of space.

Personal opinion: On the surface, this sounds like it could be the plot to a hokey B-movie. However, with George Clooney and Sandra Bullock leading the cast this will be anything but. The film is also being directed by visionary director Alfonso Cuaron (who directed Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban, which was in my opinion the most stylish film in the franchise). Given that this film will be done in 3D, this could be one of the few films that actually uses the technology effectively. I'm not sure this is the most conventional Thanksgiving film, but I'm still anxious to check it out.


27. Ted (July 13th)

Plot: "Family Guy" creator Seth MacFarlane brings his boundary-pushing brand of humor to the big screen for the first time as writer, director and voice star of "Ted." In the live action/CG-animated comedy, he tells the story of John Bennett (Mark Wahlberg), a grown man who must deal with the cherished teddy bear who came to life as the result of a childhood wish... and has refused to leave his side ever since.

Personal opinion: As anyone who has ever watched Family Guy knows, Seth McFarland can be a very funny guy. The big question though is whether that humor can translate onto the big screen. Considering that the quality of most of his animated shows has waned in the past year or so, I'm hoping it's because he's putting his best efforts into this project. McFarland has certainly improved his chances by bringing along several of his talented voice actors like Mila Kunis and Patrick Warburton to be a part of the cast. I've never been big on the whole live action/CG-animated hybrid genre, so that's a strike against the film. For this film to work, it's going to have to be something more than just a raunchier version of Alvin and the Chipmunks.


26. Wanderlust (February 24th)

Plot: Paul Rudd and Jennifer Aniston star in "Wanderlust," a raucous comedy from director David Wain ("Role Models") and producer Judd Apatow ("Knocked Up") about a couple who leaves the pressures of the big city and joins a freewheeling community where the only rule is to be yourself.

Personal opinion: This fills up the requiste role of movie that was featured on last year's preview and then got bumped. I don't feel the need to say too much more about this movie now. David Wain (Wet Hot American Summer, Role Models) has proven that he can make some very provocative, yet funny films. He's got his usual cast of actors back with him along with Jennifer Aniston, which sounds like a winning combination to me. With all that said, however, it'll probably be a tough sell getting people to come out and watch a movie about a nudist colony.


25. Chronicle (February 3rd)

Plot: Three high school students make an incredible discovery, leading to them developing uncanny powers beyond their understanding. As they learn to control their abilities, and use them to their advantage, their lives start to spin out of control, and their darker sides begin to take over.

Personal opinion: As I pointed out when I posted the trailer for this film, most people are probably tired of superheroes after this past year. But based on what I've seen I really think this is a creative approach to the genre. Taking a realistic approach combined with the documentary style of filmmaking really appeals to me. The key to this film will be in its execution. Will this unique idea be able to cause the genre to soar to new heights or will a failure to follow through cause it to crash and burn? Only time will tell.

From the Batcave archives...

While most of us are focusing on the upcoming Batman film (to be previewed at some point this week in my 2012 list), here's some rare and unused footage from The Dark Knight. While this was posted on YouTube over a year ago, it's new to me and hopefully new to you as well. Enjoy!

RBR: Larry Crowne

After seeing the charming trailer last summer for Larry Crowne I eagerly anticipated seeing the film. Being a college professor who frequently teaches public speaking, I wanted to see this film about a middle-aged man (Tom Hanks) who enrolls in a public speaking course after being laid off from his job. Now that I have, I'm resigned to the fact that most of the critics who panned this film were correct. This is not an actively bad film, it's just one that has no significance or substance to it. On the surface, it seems like a film fitting of our current society and yet it never really deals with the economic hardships that so many real people are facing. Despite having no job and no money, Crowne banters with his neighbor (Cedric the Entertainer), bonds with an ecclectic bunch of students who ride around on their Vespa scooters, and flirts with his speech teacher (Julia Roberts). Hanks' likeable personality and cheery disposition just seem out of place for this character and this film. It's hard to get mad at someone like Hanks (who also directed and co-wrote the film), but you can't help but be frustrated that the characters and the story seem so naively ignorant of reality. I did enjoy the speech class scenes, however, and was able to relate a lot to the interactions between teacher and student, so at least there was that. Given the happy nature of the film, there are likely plenty of people who will find it pleasant enough to make it worthy of a rental. If you do give it a viewing, however, just don't expect to gain any sort of poignancy or perspective by watching it. This is pure Hollywood fluff. Rating: ** 1/2

Holy **** Batman!

The first full trailer for The Dark Knight Rises has hit the internet and I'm in geek overload at the moment. If you haven't seen it yet, check it out below.

RBR: Kung Fu Panda 2

The first Kung Fu Panda film was a pleasant surprise back in 2008 and proved that Dreamworks was capable of making an animated film on par with those offered by Pixar. In their second go-round, Po (voiced once again by Jack Black) and company deliver a solidly entertaining effort, but one that fails to match the quality of the first. Plot-wise, I really liked the story they went with here. It centers on Po's quest to find inner peace. To do so, he'll have to discover the truth about his actual parents who are connected to the film's primary villain, a peacock named Shen (nicely voiced by Gary Oldman). I actually wished the film had spent more time with this plot and character development. Instead, we get one too many action scenes meant to showcase the 3D effects. Each of the kung fu fighting scenes are well choreographed, but a little goes a long way with them. I was also disappointed that Po's master, Shifu (Dustin Hoffman) did not have a larger presence in this film. His Yoda-like character provides a nice anchor to the film without being overly cliched. Despite the excess of action, the film finishes strong with an emotional tone that hits the right notes. While not as good as the first, this continues to be Dreamworks' strongest animated franchise and I would certainly welcome another film (something that is strongly hinted at in the final scene of this one). Rating: *** 1/2

Forging a Bond?

From comingsoon.net

He's already starred in Casino Royale and Quantum of Solace and is currently filming Skyfall, but "James Bond" films producer Michael G. Wilson says he would like Daniel Craig to star in five more 007 movies.

Speaking to People.co.uk, Wilson says he hopes Craig will become the longest serving James Bond actor, passing up Roger Moore's seven appearances.

"Daniel's been a terrific Bond, a superb actor and a terrific man. The fans love him and I don't think there's a better actor to play the part... It's certainly something we'll be discussing with him once we finish shooting 'Skyfall.'"

He added that "Filming has gone very well so far and I'd love Daniel to surpass Roger's record and do eight pictures. Daniel's been an absolute pleasure to be around because he takes the role so seriously. There's really no one more passionate about making these films work than him he's a filmmaker's dream.

"A lot of people have said Daniel's been their favorite Bond since Sean Connery and I can't argue with them. He's doing a great job."

About Skyfall, Wilson said that "director Sam Mendes and Daniel are taking it back to a 60s feel, more Sean. I think that's what the fans wanted. There's a magical Goldfinger feel, surrounding it all. It's all very exciting. I can't wait for people to see the movie because I think we're making a very special Bond."

Skyfall is scheduled for a November 9, 2012 release.

Moammar Ga-daffy

Here's your first look at Sasha Baron Cohen's (Borat) new comedy, The Dictator. As with more of his moves, this seems controversial, but also hit and miss with regard to the comedy. With that said, the last few seconds of this trailer completely sold me.

RBR: The Help

This is a movie I would normally pass over, but since it is generating some Oscar buzz and I can't resist anything that has Emma Stone in it, I decided to give it a watch. The Help takes a look at the lives of African American maids in the deep south during the 1960s. Emma Stone plays Skeeter, an enlightened young woman who wants to chronicle the plight of these women. The film has some terrific acting from Stone as well Viola Davis and Octavia Spencer, both of whom are likely going to receive some recognition this awards season. The cinematography of the film is very impressive as well giving it an authentic feel of like in 1960's Mississippi. The film's weakness, however is the narrative structure. Based on a popular novel by the same name, the story focuses on too many characters and as a result, you're not really sure who's story this really is. Stone, Davis and Spencer each go through character arcs that feel like they are the primary one, yet also feel underdeveloped. Meanwhile, there are several other subplots jammed in to the film that could have easily been excised in order to devote more time to the central story. There's also the issue with this being a very santized version of what real women went through. They do the bare minimum to get the point across of the deplorable treatment these women received. Realism can be a double-edged sword, however. A more accurate depiction is appreciate by some, but this sugar-coated version enables the film to be more mainstream. I liked this film more than I thought, but I would not go as far as to say its deserving of a best picture nomination. If the subject matter interests you or if you're a fan of any of the actors here, I'd say this is worthy of a rental. Rating: ****

A early Christmas present for our ears

From the LA Times...

A new rule from the Federal Communications Commission should finally end the practice of viewers reaching for the remote control to turn down the volume every time there's a commercial break.

"The FCC today took a major step toward eliminating one of the most persistent problems of the television age -– loud commercials," the agency said in a statement.

Responding to years of complaints that the volume on commericals is louder than that of regular programming, the FCC on Tuesday passed the Commercial Advertisement Loudness Mitigation Act (CALM). The act requires commercials and entertainment and news programming to be kept at the same volume. The rules also require that the volume for promotional spots be equal to the shows around it.

Multichannel Video Program Distributors such as Time Warner Cable and Comcast Corp. and broadcasters will be responsible for making sure commerical volume is not excessive. The rule goes into effect next December.

Now can the FCC do something about the quality of commercials?

Citizen Knope deleted scenes

March on Washington

Finishing up the second part of the double feature I saw last weekend, we now come to The Ides of March, a political drama that has Oscar aspirations about a man with presidential aspirations. In this case that man is George Clooney, who also directed and co-wrote this film. The film, based on the play Farragut North, examines the dilemmas faced by everyone involved in trying to be, or help someone to be the next leader of the free world.

While Clooney is the candidate running for president, the film spends more time with his staff as they run his campaign. At the forefront of that is Stephen Meyers (played by Ryan Gosling), he's a hotshot assistant who claims to have already worked on more campaigns than anyone ten years his senior. That experience doesn't seem to help him much as he quickly gets caught up in the game of dirty politics. He takes a meeting with the chief of staff of the guy Clooney is running against (played by Paul Giamatti). When Clooney's chief of staff (played by Phillip Seymour Hoffman) finds out about the meeting, he's none too pleased.

When you have a cast that features four talented individuals like this film does, you expect to have scene after scene of scenary chewing taking place and yet most of the dialogue between these characters falls a bit flat. I was expecting these scenes to be more explosive where you really felt the emotion behind their words. Perhaps I've gotten too spoiled by Aaron Sorkin dialogue and expected too much here, but I just didn't find these talky scenes to be as gripping as I expected them too. This is not to say they are bad by any means. I was just suprised I didn't love them more.

A lot of their discussions and strategizing are a result of the actions of a young staffer on Clooney's campaign played by Evan Rachel Wood. She takes an interest in Gosling's character, which causes a number of problems. Without spoiling too much about what she does, I will say that I didn't buy into this subplot. Her actions and motivations don't seem realistic and they drag the film down. When it's focused on her, it strays from being a political potboiled into an area of tawdry melodrama.

What this film does do right though is give us a fair, albeit frustrating depiction of the nature of politics. You see as you watch these characters operate that anyone who enters the political game is unable to come out of it unscathed. Everyone has to get a little dirty, it's just a matter of whether or not you embrace it or not. Those who think their ideals can rise above the mudslinging are only fooling themselves. Some moviegoes may be frustrated with that theme since it prevents them from having anybody that they can root for or rally behind in this film.

Though I've pointed out some flaws in this film, it is by no means a bad film. These flaws only get pointed out because the expectations for this film were so high in the first place. In that way, The Ides of March may be very similar to real life presidential candidates. While they make a good first impression, the more you peel back the layers the more disappointment you find. That should in no way suggest that you should ignore this movie like so many people ignore potential candidates. Though this may not win the equivalent of the Oval Office come Academy Award season, it still has a lot to say that should be heard. Grade: B

Future Engagement

In a few weeks, I'll be doing my big preview of the films coming out in 2012 that I'm most looking forward to. I would imagine Five Year Engagement, starring Jason Segal and Emily Blunt will be finding its way onto my list. You can read more about it in my preview, but until then enjoy the first trailer for the film.

RBR: The Change-Up

If you watched Freaky Friday and felt it needed more poop and sex jokes, then The Change Up is for you. This latest entry in the body swapping genre pairs Jason Bateman, as the over-worked dad and Ryan Reynolds as the carefree, crass bachelor. Credit goes out to both guys for being able to pull off a realistic switcheroo while avoiding doing simple imitations of the other. Each actor does a nice job of truly embodying the other. Aside from the tired premise, the film's major problem comes from ineffectively developing a proper arc for each of these characters. The whole reason to do such a movie is to have each person reevaluate their own life by enjoying the novelty of being someone else. However, the life that they initially establish for Ryan Reynolds character is so vulgar and irresponsible, that there's no way anyone, let alone the uptight character that Jason Bateman plays, would actually want that life. Ultimately Bateman's character just needs a vacation, not someone else's life. This proves to be true as his character doesn't really differ once he's back in his own body while Reynolds ends up getting to see the error of his ways and becomes a better person (who ends up getting Olivia Wilde in the end - not a bad deal at all). The body swapping formula works, which is why it keeps getting reused. Here, the emotion associated with their dilemma is felt and comes off genuine. I just wished they hadn't felt the need to be so crass in their humor. The jokes made by, about, or around children in this film are particularly troubling and were not needed. I can't say that I completely hated this film, but it's tough for me to fully recommend it either because of its problems. Guys will likely be turned off by the sentimentality while women won't care for the gross-out humor. If this film had been able to swap out some of its elements, perhaps it too could have been better off for it. Rating: ** 1/2

Myth-ed it by that much

From EW.com...

A stunt for the TV show MythBusters sent an errant cannonball through a California family’s house and into a parked minivan a few hundred feet away.

Producers for the Discovery Channel show fired the cannonball Tuesday at the Alameda County Sheriff’s Department bomb range behind the Santa Rita Jail when it misfired.

Sheriff’s spokesman J.D. Nelson told the Contra Costa Times that no one was injured and the home’s residents didn’t even wake up until the dust was settled — literally on top of them.

Nelson, who is also a consultant for the show, said producers have used the cannon that they built at the range more than 50 times without incident.

The cannonball was supposed to go through a few water-filled barrels and a concrete wall. Instead, it passed over the barrels, through the wall, and then took a “very unfortunate bounce that sent the ball skyward,” Nelson said.

About 700 feet away, it bounced in front of the Dublin home, then tore through the front door and out a wall on the back of the house. The projectile then bounced at least once more and crossed the road before smashing the window and dashboard of the minivan, where it came to rest.

“We had some tremendous bad luck and some tremendous good luck” in that no one was hurt, Nelson said.

Jasbir Gill, who owns the minivan, said he and his children had just gotten home.

“It’s scary,” Gill said. “I was in the van five minutes before this happened.”

Nelson said he did not know the exact size, speed or weight of the cannonball.

The show, according to the Discovery Channel website, mixes “scientific method with gleeful curiosity and plain old-fashioned ingenuity to create [its] own signature style of explosive experimentation.”

Keys to success

You know me, I'm not a huge music guy, so you know it's a big deal when I bother to mention a group/song that I appreciate it. In this case, it's the Ohio-based group, The Black Keys, who gave a rocking performance on Saturday Night Live this past weekend. I caught on to them with the previous album and have thus far enjoyed everything I've heard on their new album, El Camino, which was released this week. Not only do they know how to rock, but they also create some enjoyable music videos as well. Below you can watch both the one for Lonely Boy, which is the first single off their new album and the one for Howling For You, which was their big hit from their previous album.

RBR: Friends With Benfits

It's hard not to compare this to No Strings Attached considering they share the same set up and both feature an actress from Black Swan, but I'll do my best to base my review solely on its own merits. One of the things that this film does in setting up its 'sex with no consequences' premise is to mock and tear down the conventions and cliches found in most romantic comedies. I have no problem with that and in fact some of their snark towards the genre produces some good laughs (take that Katherine Heigl!). The problem comes with the fact that while mocking them, the film itself fails to rise above those cliches. This is disappointing considering director Will Gluck had been successful at escaping the cliches of the high school comedy genre with his previous film, Easy A. Justin Timberlake and Mila Kunis have a light, breezy chemistry and you can buy them being together whether it's as sleepin' buddies or in a relationship. There's no reason other than it's a movie to have them go through some sort of conflict or strife. It feels forces and causes the audience to grow impatient waiting for the inevitable reconciliation. While that flaw is disappointing, it does not completely ruin the film. As I said, the two leads work well together and unlike so many romantic comedies, this film features an appealing supporting cast thanks in large part to terrific actors like Richard Jenkins and Patricia Clarkson. In comparison to most films in this genre, this one is watchable and entertaining. Just don't expect it to transcend the genre like it thinks it does. Rating: ***

The Trial of Leslie Knope deleted scenes

Beane counter

After a long drought (for me) of going to the theater, I finally made it there for a cool deal being offered by Regal Cinemas - a 2 for 1 double feature of Moneyball and The Ides of March (review forthcoming). Both films were ones I was highly anticipating, but for various reasons had not yet seen.

We'll begin with the baseball drama, Moneyball, starring Brad Pitt as Oakland A's GM, Billy Beane. The film focuses on the 2002 baseball season where Beane attempted to put a winning team on the field despite having one of the lowest payroll's in the league and losing star players left and right to teams (like the Yankees) who could afford to pay these players higher salaries. Beane devises a new way of scouting talent after meeting Peter Brand (played by Jonah Hill), a young, Ivy league grad, who was working with the Cleveland Indians organization; A fact I did not know. (Once again, the Indians find a way of giving up talent both on the field and in the front office).

Together, Beane and Brand begin to adopt the philosophy of Bill James, a statistician who had developed a formula to evaluate players' worth from a different way. One of the biggest factors that they focus on in the film is a player's on base percentage. In general, you'll score more runs if your team consists of a lot of players who find a way of getting on base (whether by a hit or walk). While this discussion and usage of statistics to create a winning team could have been dense and dull, it's not. Director Bennett Miller, along with Aaron Sorkin (The Social Network) and Steve Zallian, who co-wrote the film do an excellent job of getting the Moneyball philosophy across in a simple manner that could be understood by everyone. Personally, being a guy who likes statistics, I actually wish they would have discussed the number crunching even more, but I'm perfectly fine with the way its depicted.

The film's best scenes come from the intereactions between Beane and those who disagree with this new approach. Most of the A's scouts are incedulous towards his way of thinking since it spit in the face of the way they had evaluated talent. This method made them virtually obsolete. Also against Beane's philosophy is A's manager, Art Howe. He's played by Phillip Seymour Hoffman, in a terrific performance. While not the most postive portrayal, Hoffman does a nice job of coming off as grizzled and bitter. The scenes he has with Beane are engaging and really help in making you root for Beane.

While it takes some time, Beane's system begins to work much to the surprise of everyone else. One of the best things about this movie is the usage of actual media coverage throughout the season. We hear comments from sportscasters, radio hosts, and fans analyzing both the team's early struggles and their improvement as the season progressed. You really get a sense of how little everyone knows about sports when you're not actually inside the organization. It's catharic to listen to so-called analysts be completely off base when it comes to identifying why a team succeeds or fails.

Watching the film, you learn how Beane's desire to have this philosophy work is so personal. Through flashbacks the film shows how Beane himself was supposed to be a 'can't-miss' prospect who never panned out in the big leagues. You see how he's driven to prove the flaw in scouts' analysis and wants to avoid making personal connections with talent because of the possible pain it can bring. If the film has a weakness, and its minor one, it's that the film has a few too many introspection shots involving Pitt staring off in the distance contemplating. I get what they were going for, but I also feel its a bit overdone.

Overall, this is one of the best baseball movies out there and it hardly features any game play. At its core, its an underdog story that anyone can get behind. If you know anything about baseball and the recent history of Oakland, you'll also know that while Beane's story has not personally had the perfect ending, the imprint his Moneyball approach has had on the game is evident throughout the league. Like last year's The Social Network, I love the theme of individuals thinking outside the box and watching the rest of the world struggle to comprehend the ramifications of such an idea. Like a good utility player, Moneyball is versatile in providing something entertaining for a variety of audiences. Its ability to do so makes this film a home run. Grade: A

Getting a slice of some sweet pie

Once again Funny or Die delivers...this time with a fake 1980s sexual harassment video featuring Tim Meadows as Herman Cain

Herman Cain's 1986 Sexual Harassment Training from Tim Meadows

RBR: Crazy Stupid Love

I'm not going to beat around the bush...I hated this movie. And the thing of it is, is that I shouldn't have. It had a terrific cast including Steve Carell, Emma Stone, Julianne Moore, and Ryan Gosling. It also received effusive praise from Entertainment Weekly, amongst other movie critics. But after watching it, I don't know what happened or why I did not have the same reaction as so many people did to this movie. Much of the praise it's receiving is for its seemingly realistic depiction of adult romance, but that wasn't my take on it. There are at least two major scenes in the film where a surprise/twist is revealed that were utterly preposterous. There is no way the characters in the film would have been that stupid or lacked the necessary communication skills in order to learn of these surprises earlier. I was shocked that the film would try to pass that off as believable to audiences. Beyond that, you have a lot of underwritten characters who's motivations for their actions are unclear and thus undercut the emotion behind them. I also found it insulting how much of Steve Carell's story arc seems cribbed straight from The 40 Year Old Virgin. Say what you will, but I found his quest to improve himself in order to find true love much more realistic and appealing. My only guess is that many reviewers must have been distracted by the unnecessary constant display of Ryan Gosling's abs to effectively evaluate the major flaws of this movie. How else do you explain more people not being disturbed by the creepy subplot involving Carell's 13 year old son lusting over the 17 year old babysitter, who was in turn lusting after Carell. I understand critics' and viewers' desire for better romantic comedies than the pile of dreck turned out by Katherine Heigl every year, but this is not the answer. Those who love this movie are the one ones who are crazy and stupid. Rating: * 1/2