Covert tops

Picture it...the year was 1980. I was a mere speck in my parents' eyes as the world was in turmoil thanks to unrest in Iran that led to several U.S. embassy employees to be taken hostage. A few select Americans managed to avoid capture and fled to the nearby home of the Canadian ambassador. Though free, these individuals have no was of getting out of the country without being recognized as the missing embassy workers. Realizing this, the CIA must find a way of safely bringing them back home.

This sets the stage for Argo, the terrific film by Ben Affleck who is turning into quite the polished director despite only having three films under his belt. He has managed to turn a story that most people already know the outcome into one of the most thrilling, gripping stories in a long time. Part of that is due to the stranger than fiction approach that the CIA used in order to extricate these people

Affleck also stars as Tony Mendez, the man who comes out with the wild rescue plan. Mendez works with a producer in Hollywood (Alan Arkin) in order to create a fake movie. Mendez then travels to Iran under the guise of wanting to shoot scenes in the country. He then pretends that the embassy workers are members of his crew in order to bring them back with him. Argo refers to the name of the fake movie.

With the way the film is constructed, you really get three films in one. One story involves Mendez's time in Hollywood trying to put all of the pieces together for this fake movie. Along with Arkin, these scenes also feature John Goodman playing a visual effects expert who serves as a sort of liason between Washington and Hollywood. Being a film lover, I truly enjoyed these scenes and the ability to see some of the inner workings of the film industry. It turns out it's pretty easy to earn buzz for a film, even a fake one.

The second story involves the drama and political maneuvering taking place in Washington. We see a lot of hesitation from some of the political bigwigs to go along with Mendez's plan. They even pull the plug on the whole plan at a critical point, which provides some great tension. Bryan Cranston, who plays Mendez's boss is simply terrific here. You feel the dilemma he goes through between appeasing the higher ups and supporting Mendez.

Finally, we get the scenes in Iran. One of the most impressive things about this film is that Affleck does not simply paint them as the 'evil foreigner'. We understand their perspective on this matter. In that way, we see how tenuous of a situation the Americans were in. These were people who felt very strongly about their beliefs and wanted an injustice (from their perspective) rectified. I have no doubt that some creative liberties were taken when depicting the effort to get these Americans back home, but when the end result is such a captivating film, you don't really mind.

Regardless of how familiar you are with this story, I whole-heartedly recommend that you check it out. Affleck does a great job of transporting you back to this period of history. The costuming and music are authentic. Actual news footage is also expertly interwoven into the film. You will find yourself just as captivated with this film as you were with the actual events back in the day. And given the Oscar buzz that this movie is receiving, I'm clearly not alone in thinking this. This is one history lesson you'll have no problem staying awake through. Grade: A

Cross to bear

Like many, I had trepidations about the continuation of the Bourne franchise without Matt Damon as the amnesiatic assassin or Paul Greengrass as director. But to the studio's credit, The Bourne Legacy is not simply a lazy or spiteful reboot like Sony did with Spider-Man. Instead they created an expansion of the universe created by Robert Ludlum's spy novels and attempted to look at the story from a different perspective.

That perspective comes from Aaron Cross, (Jeremy Renner) an agent of Operation Outcome, a separate group from Treadstone, which Bourne belonged too. A key difference between the two groups is that Outcome agents have been put on a pill regimen to medically enhance their abilities. The film opens during the timeline of the last Bourne film. We see from new footage different government officials reacting to Bourne's efforts to expose Treadstone. Realizing that the operation is blown, the CIA decides to pull the plug on all their operations. A team led by a retired Air Force colonel (played by Edward Norton) is tasked with eliminating all of their agents. Cross is fortunate enough to escape and begins his quest for determining why the government is now trying to kill him.

All of this set-up is terrific. The film nicely weaves the events of the previous film into this story and justifiably establishes a reason why there would now be someone else wanting to exact revenge on our government. The scenes establishing Renner's character are also well done. He's currently training in Alaska, so we get several instances of him battling the elements before dealing with the government, including a fight with wolves that was on par with the action scene earlier this year in The Grey

Unfortunately, the movie loses steam in the second half. Cross' character seems more intent on getting a fresh supply of the pills that give him his abilities than he is about exacting revenge. We get a lot of scenes with him talking about the pills, showing the effects of withdrawl, and looking for the pills and none of it is particularly engaging. Helping him in his quest is a doctor played by Rachel Weisz who originally gave him the drugs. She's being hunted by the government as well after she managed to escape an attack on her lab. Weisz is fine here, but I never saw any chemistry between her and Renner in the same way that I did between Damon and Marie (Franke Potente) or Nikki (Julia Stiles).

Pacing also becomes problematic as the movie progresses. After a series of conversations bog down the middle of the film, we get an overly long action sequence at the very end of the film. Not only should there have been a better balance between the action and dialogue, but the film's final action sequence comes off as anti-climatic. I expected more to come and yet shortly after the chase sequence finishes, the credits begin to roll.

Though frustrating, the film's abrupt ending left many doors open to be explored down the line in yet more Bourne films. I know I am interested in seeing more. Although admittedly, it's more of an interest in seeing the characters established in the first three films, rather than anyone new in Legacy That not only goes for Damon, but also people like Joan Allen and David Straithairn, who have little more than cameos in Legacy As for the new characters, Renner was fine when it came to the action, but he still strikes me as a better sidekick than leader (see The Avengers and Ghost Protocol). Edward Norton is always an excellent actor, but we didn't learn enough about his character here to care whether or not he returns.

The Bourne Legacy is a difficult film to rate because a lot hinges on whether or not anymore films in the franchise will be made. If this is it, then the film feels like an underwhelming and unnecessary capper. If this is a jump start to a new trilogy, then you can appreciate what it was trying to set up. For now I'm giving the film I mild recommendation for its ability to nicely integrate the storyline of the original trilogy and for whetting fans' appetites for the possibility of more adventures with Treadstone, Outcome, Blackbriar and the rest of the shady CIA operations. If fans of the franchise come in with lowered expectations, they'll likely enjoy this latest spy thriller. Grade: B

RBR: Safe House

Familiarity breeds contempt as the old saying goes. In Safe House, there's a lot of familiarity to the story. While I would not go as far as saying that I have contempt for the film, I am disappointed, they couldn't do more here or at least create a more intelligent script. The story centers around Tobin Frost (played by Denzel Washington), a former CIA agent who is now believed to be a traitor to the United States. After remaining off the grid for nearly a decade, he shows up at a safe house in Cape Town, South Africa where a wet behind the ears agent (Ryan Reynolds) is tasked with keeping him alive while everyone else seems to want him dead. Once again, I fail to see the appeal of Reynolds as an actor. Though this is far from his worst performance, he still comes off as unconvincing in this role as a novice agent. On the other hand, Washington manages to rise above the mediocre material and deliver antoher compelling performance. I would have liked for there to have been more engaging dialogue between Washington and Reynolds' characters, but the film opts to pad its run time with several chase sequences and gun fights instead. I also felt that there was information pertaining to several characters' motivations that should have been revealed sooner. I get trying to build some suspense, but in this case it prevented me from becoming more interested in the outcome of the people in the film. Safe House is a perfectly serviceable action thriller, but it had the potential to be so much more. Washington is the only real stand out here, so if you're a fan of his, I'd definitely recommend you check it out. Rating: *** 1/2

Don't Treadstone on me

I've been on the fence about extending the Bourne franchise without Matt Damon, but this latest trailer for The Bourne Legacy has me completely sold. From the looks of things they've found a way of successfully integrating the existing storyline while also creating something unique as well. They appear to have enough actors from the previous films couples with some excellent new additions to make this a must see come this August. Have a look for yourself.