RBR: Side Effects

It feels like it's been forever since I actually saw this film, but I'm just now getting around to putting up my review. Let's see how well I can remember my thoughts on it. Rooney Mara stars as Emily, a young woman who is struggling after the recent release of her husband (Channing Tatum) who was doing prison time for insider trading. Emily begins seeing a therapist (Jude Law) who prescribes a new drug to help her deal with her issues. A side effect of the drug is that it causes her to sleepwalk. During one of her sleepwalking episodes she unknowingly stabs her husband with a knife, killing him. From there the film takes several twists and turns as it is unclear as to who truly is responsible for this death. Directed by Steven Soderbergh in what is apparently his last film, Side Effects begins very compelling. Soderbergh creates a great sense of mystery and suspense. The social commentary on the over-reliance on prescription medication also feels fresh and compelling. The film somewhat comes off the rails in the second half with a few too many twists that make it confusing as to some of the characters' motives for their actions and how they benefitted from them. By the film's end you're left unsure as to whether or not the right people got their comeuppance or not. Still, the film is mostly enjoyable thanks to Soderbergh style, which will be missed if he makes his retirement stick. Fans of thrillers would be well off if they made an effort to check this film out. It's an easy prescription for me to fill.

Bad medicine

The subject matter of Side Effects doesn't exactly seem like it would be the type of film that I would gravitate toward, but given that this is being directed by Steven Soderbergh, I'm inherently interested in it. Here's the first trailer to watch and see what you think.

Revenge is Swede

As the world mourns the end of the Harry Potter film franchise, the start of a new movie franchise based on a popular series of books begins. The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo is the first installment of the Millennium trilogy by Steig Larsson. While these films will never meet the financial success of the Potter films, if for no other reason than its decidely adult subject matter, it can already boast something that none of the Potter films can, a Best Picture nomination.

The film is directed by David Fincher (The Social Network) who continues his impressive string of films. After delving into the cerebral world of Mark Zuckerberg, Fincher is back to familiar territory of gore and murder. He once again finds away of depicting the darker side of our human nature in a compelling manner. He manages to suck you in by focusing on protagonists who are just as, if not more so, scarred than the killers they are tracking. In this case, the film centers around two such protagonists; Mikael Blomkvist (played by Daniel Craig) and Lisbeth Salander (played by Rooney Mara).

Blomkvist is a discredited journalist who's been asked to investigate a 40 year old mystery involving the disappearance of Henrik Vanger's niece. The job offers him an easy way to escape the media scrutiny he's under after being convicted of libel. Salander eventually comes on as his research assistant. However, we spend significant time prior to their partnership learning of the hardships she's endured in her life that have manifested into her severe social disfunctions. Their relationship is unconventional to say the least but proves to be highly effective in getting to the bottom of this mystery.

This central mystery is the strongest part of the film. Through the course of Blomkvist's investigation we meet several members of the Vanger family, each with their own set of secrets. The fact that these family members hardly talk to each other provides makes them all suspicious and enables the audience to continue guessing as to what really happened. While the film does the best it can at keeping all of these characters straight and properly explaining their history, you can also see where this would likely be even more engaging in the book.

The one thing, however, that bugged me about the film was how oddly superfluous the Lisbeth character seems to the story. A good portion of the film's beginning is spent on her before she even becomes connected with the Vanger case. While it can be argued that this was done to establish her character, a lot of that could have been surmised simply by her outward appearance. It's clear from the piercings and titular tattoo that this is not a conventional girl and she's likely led a rough life. Why we needed to see, in such graphic detail I might add, some of these hardships was unclear. Furthermore, while she proves to be quite helpful in solving the mystery, it's likely that Blomkvist would have been able to solve it himself had she not been there. None of this would bother me as much if it wasn't for the fact that everything else suggests she is supposed to be the central character. Perhaps her centrality to the story is stronger within the context of Larsson's three books, but in this film her presence came off more exploitative that necessary.

While I struggle with that, I in no means want this to come off as a negative review. The acting and directing are great and the story is engrossing. Despite a run time of over two and half hours, the film does not "dragon". It briskly moves along as you try to figure out the clues along with the characters. I also like how they managed to keep the film isolated enough where you're satisfied if the other two books never get adapted, but left enough to make you curious to see where future films could go if they do get made. Though this is not my favorite Fincher film, nor his best, this is still an excellent movie and one I recommend. He's one of the few directors out there today who can consistently create a movie that will be tattooed into your mind long after you've finished watching it. Grade: B+