Playing the race card

As usual, I'm way late on getting to one of my reviews, but at least this one will be a full one and not a quick hit, so take what you can get.

When you think of some of the greatest athletes in their respective sports, it could be argued that they would not have achieved their greatness had it not been for a rival who equaled them in skill and forced them to be even better. That is certainly true for the two men at the center of Rush, a film about the real-life rivalry of Formula 1 racers James Hunt and Niki Lauda. Directed by Ron Howard, this film gives us one of the best stories about rivalry that I have ever seen.

Hunt (played by Chris Hemsworth) is a blond-haired playboy who has seen success in every venture of his life. Before moving up to Formula 1, he relishes as the big fish in the small pond. His first true taste of competition comes from Lauda (played by Daniel Bruhl). His calculated efforts to be the fastest on the track rub Hunt the wrong way. After establishing these characters, the film focuses on the 1976 season as both men risk everything in order to be champion.

What makes their story interesting is how these two were true opposites. Hunt had his dashing good looks and carefree attitude. Lauda was more the intellectual, using his brains to gain a competitive. Hunt was a people person, while Lauda was stand-offish and brusk. Having a rival be your polar opposite is not a new storytelling device. Yet what makes Rush stand out is that neither man is portrayed negatively or as the villain here. Each man has their strengths and their weaknesses. Howard lets history dictate how we feel about these individuals rather than telling us who we should root for.

Howard should also be commended for the way he is able to depict the racing scenes themselves. You gain the thrill and exhilaration of watching the races just as if you were at the speedway yourself. Howard does not shy away from the dangerous nature of the sport. Scenes involves crashes and wrecks are realistically shown, neither sugar-coating the scares nor exploiting the violence. If you are at all familiar with the rivalry between the two, you know that Lauda is involved in a life-threatening crash midway through the season. We watch in shocked amazement as he refuses to let the accident deter his motivation to be the best

While the focus is on the events on the track, we do get glimpses into the personal lives of these two and the roles they played on their ability to win. Each man has varying levels of success when it comes to their love life. Hunt, for instance, sees his marriage (his wife is played by Olivia Wilde) fall apart in the midst of the season. Although Howard is right to focus on the racing, I would have liked to see him flesh out the women in these guys' lives more fully

Given that Howard does not take as many creative liberties with their story as some directors do when telling the real life stories of other notable people, there are not a lot of surprises here if you are at familiar with the outcome of the '76 season. I personally did not know the end result so I was fully engrossed in how things would play out. However, others may feel cheated that the film does not offer more than a summary of their competitive season.

Credit goes to both Hemsworth and Bruhl for their performances here. Both are outstanding in fully fleshing out who these men were and showing their complexities. I would imagine many will come to the film simply for the racing scenes and will leave surprise as to how good both of these men are in their respective roles. In a different year, I could see either one earn some awards buzz, but I have a feeling this year will have too crowded of a field for their work to be recognized.

I cannot say that I am a huge fan of car racing, but the competitive nature of athletes does capture my attention. For that reason, this movie is excellent. Its story transcends the featured sport and focuses more on the will to win. That is a theme that anyone can relate to. When it comes to athlete biopics, this one is able to rush ahead of the pack. Grade: A-

RBR: The Incredible Burt Wonderstone

As I've mentioned on here before, I'm a sucker when it comes to movies about magic. When you couple that subject matter with a talented cast that features the likes of Steve Carell, Steve Buscemi, Alan Arkin, and Jim Carrey, it should equal great success. It's too bad that the people behind The Incredible Burt Wonderstone seem to have no clue what to do with the interesting subject matter or its great actors. This comedy attempts to tell a story about a modern day magician. There are several ways you could take the story - you could do a riff on Sigfried and Roy and the odd nature of their working relationship, you could address how those "Magicians' Secrets Revealed" show have spoiled the fun of magic for a lot of people, you could deal with the rivalry between renegade street magic and more traditional magic. This film touches upon each of those storylines but never delves into any of them deeply enough or in any compelling fashion. Storyline issues aside, the root of the film's problem is their decision to make Carell's character such an insufferable boor. As Wonderstone he's initially portrayed in flashbacks as a sympathetic nerd who uses magic to escape the pains in his life. Once the film moves into present day, we're given no indication as to why he's become so obnoxious to everyone around him. This makes it difficult for us to have any interest in seeing him succeed when his career begins to suffer. The final blow comes during the film's final climatic scenes which reveal Wonderstone's grand illusion. It's not only disappointing to learn how the trick is done, its disturbing to see how unmagical it truly is. Frankly, the only magic trick I want to see now is for someone to make my memory of this movie disappear. Rating: **

RBR: Butter

After waiting through several delays, I was dismayed when this small comedy about a butter carving competition came out only to be blasted by several critics. Many chastised it for its poor effort at political satire and lampooning of small town America. Though disappointed, I still decided to give it a try and found that I did not share a lot of the critics' complaints. If you look for it, there are some definite parallels between two of the competitions' contestants and Barack Obama and Sarah Palin. When I watched the film though, I didn't really focus on that comparison and found it much more palatable as a result. The film is far from perfect, however. There are subplots, like one involving Olivia Wilde as a stripper that really feel superfluous. It's hard to complain though about seeing her scantily clad for 90 minutes. There's also a little too much of Jennifer Garner, who plays the phony sweet ultra Conservative Palin-esque competitor. Those flaws aside, I will admit to laughing a lot, which is always an essential component to any comedy. I also found the butter carving concept fascinating and frankly wished there had been more of it. If you don't read too much into the film's message, this works as a quirky indie comedy. If you look for sharp satire, then you may want to save your cholesterol and just skip Butter. Rating: ****

Butter late than never

This film was filmed two years ago, screened at the Toronto Film Festival last year and now finally seems to be set for release to the public. Here's a trailer for the satirical film, Butter starring Jennifer Garner, Ty Burrell, Hugh Jackman, Olivia Wilde, and Rob Corddry.